CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 137

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A New Method for The Quantification of Neutrophil and Eosinophil Cationic Proteins in Feces: Establishment of Normal Levels and Clinical Application in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Peterson, Christer GB, Eklund, Elisabeth, Taha, Yesuf, Raab, Yngve, Carlson, Marie·2002·American Journal of Gastroenterology
DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05837.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives The aims of this study were 1) to develop a valid method for the measurement of the eosinophil proteins eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) and neutrophil proteins myeloperoxidase and human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL) in feces and 2) to investigate their potential role as disease activity markers in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods Feces samples were obtained from 44 apparently healthy individuals (HIs), 18 patients with IBD (11 with ulcerative colitis [UC] and seven with Crohn's disease [CD]), and three with collagen colitis. The granulocyte markers were measured using immunoassays in supernatants from processed feces. Results ECP, myeloperoxidase, and, to a lesser degree, EPX and HNL were bound to the solid part of feces. However, feces homogenized in an extraction buffer containing the cationic detergent N-cetyl-N,N,N-trimethylammonium bromide allowed an efficient recovery of the proteins (i.e., up to 100-fold increased levels compared to homogenization in saline). All four proteins were stable for at least 7 days at +6 degrees C and at least 3 days at +22 degrees C. The normal fecal geometric mean (95th percentile) levels of ECP, EPX, myeloperoxidase, and HNL were estimated to be, respectively, 1.69 microg/g (6.41), 0.57 microg/g (1.72), 3.54 microg/g (8.77), and 1.97 microg/g (4.91). Markedly increased feces levels of all markers (p Conclusions The method described here takes into account the molecular properties of the gra…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05837.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Olsson I., 1974, Blood, 44, 235, 10.1182/blood.V44.2.235.235 · DOI
  2. Peterson C.G.B., 1983, Immunology, 50, 19
  3. Giembycz M.A., 1999, Pharmacol Rev, 51, 213
  4. Hallgren R., 1989, Am J Med, 86, 56, 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90230-1 · DOI
  5. Lavo B., 1989, Am J Med, 87, 655, 10.1016/S0002-9343(89)80399-7 · DOI
  6. Sarin S.K., 1987, Dig Dis Sci, 32, 363, 10.1007/BF01296289 · DOI
  7. Makiyama K., 1995, J Gastroenterol, 30, 64
  8. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.262309.x · DOI
  9. Oshitani N., 1997, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 12, 809, 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1997.tb00376.x · DOI
  10. 10.1023/A:1018843104511 · DOI
  11. Berstad A., 1993, Hepatogastroenterology, 40, 276
  12. 10.1023/A:1018886423475 · DOI
  13. Levy A.M., 1997, Mayo Clin Proc, 72, 117, 10.4065/72.2.117 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0002-9270(99)00699-1 · DOI
  15. Xu S.Y., 1994, Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 54, 365, 10.3109/00365519409088436 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s004180050129 · DOI
  17. 10.1083/jcb.63.1.251 · DOI
  18. Saverymuttu S.H., 1986, Gastroenterology, 90, 1121, 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90376-8 · DOI
  19. Izzo R.S., 1992, Am J Gastroenterol, 87, 1447
  20. Sugi K., 1996, Am J Gastroenterol, 91, 927
  21. Garland C.F., 1981, Gastroenterology, 81, 1115, 10.1016/S0016-5085(81)80021-2 · DOI
  22. Best W.R., 1979, Gastroenterology, 77, 843, 10.1016/0016-5085(79)90384-6 · DOI
  23. Binder V., 1970, Scand J Gastroenterol, 5, 627, 10.1080/00365521.1970.12096647 · DOI
  24. Nielsen L.P., 1998, Allergy, 53, 778, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03974.x · DOI
  25. Peterson C.G.B., 1988, Eur J Haematol, 40, 415, 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1988.tb00850.x · DOI
  26. Olsson I., 1972, Scand J Haematol, 9, 483, 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1972.tb00974.x · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00542.x · DOI
  28. Venge P., 1983, Immunobiology of the eosinophil, 163
  29. Nauseef W.M., 1986, Blood, 67, 1504, 10.1182/blood.V67.5.1504.1504 · DOI
  30. Carlson M., 1994, Br J Haematol, 86, 41, 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb03250.x · DOI
  31. Peterson C.G.B., 1991, Clin Exp Allergy, 21, 561, 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1991.tb00847.x · DOI
  32. Raab Y., 1993, Gut, 34, 1203, 10.1136/gut.34.9.1203 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0002-9270(99)00279-8 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03743.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, C. G., Eklund, E., Taha, Y., Raab, Y., & Carlson, M.
Venue
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2002-07
Volume
97
Issue
7
Pages
1755-1762
ISSN
0002-9270
DOI
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05837.x
Cited by
137
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review