Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eosinophils in the Esophagus—Peptic or Allergic Eosinophilic Esophagitis? Case Series of Three Patients with Esophageal Eosinophilia

Ngo, Peter, Furuta, Glenn T, Antonioli, Donald A, Fox, Victor L·2006·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Scattered eosinophils in the distal esophagus traditionally provide the hallmark for peptic esophagitis, but the upper limit of eosinophils and the longitudinal extent of peptic inflammation along the esophagus are unknown. Recently, adults and children with upper intestinal symptoms and >20 eosinophils/high-power field (eos/HPF) have been given the diagnosis of allergic esophagitis. Standardized diagnostic criteria for allergic esophagitis are lacking and the isolated finding of large numbers of eosinophils in the squamous epithelium has been used as the defining feature. We cared for three patients with symptoms and endoscopic features of esophagitis with >20 eos/HPF in their esophageal mucosa. Symptoms, endoscopic features, and histologic findings resolved after 2 months of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The aim of this case series is to demonstrate that features thought to be consistent with a diagnosis of allergic esophagitis are also observed in peptic esophagitis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of three patients with esophagitis (>20 eos/HPF) whose symptoms and eosinophilia resolved with PPI treatment was performed. Esophageal biopsies were reviewed in a blinded manner by one pathologist. RESULTS: Patients (aged 14, 25, and 5 yr) presented with dysphagia, food impaction, and vomiting. Endoscopic features included white exudates and linear furrows. None of the patients received antiallergic treatments or dietary eliminations prior to endoscopy. Following treatment with PPIs alone, all patients became asymptomatic and endoscopic findings reverted to normal. In all three patients, pre- and post-PPI treatment eosinophil numbers/HPF decreased to normal/near normal (37 to 1, 21 to 3, and 52 to 0 eosinophils/HPF in patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Large numbers of eosinophils can be seen in peptic esophagitis. This histologic finding must be interpreted in the context of the clinical setting in which it is obtained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00562.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Ngo, P., Furuta, G. T., Antonioli, D. A., & Fox, V. L.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2006-07
Volume
101
Issue
7
Pages
1666-1670
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2031413046
Cited by
306
References
14
FWCI
28.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eosinophils in the Esophagus—Peptic or Allergic Eosinophilic Esophagitis? Case Series of Three Patients with Esophageal Eosinophilia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00562.x
The paper
Ngo, P., Furuta, G. T., Antonioli, D. A., & Fox, V. L. (2006). Eosinophils in the Esophagus—Peptic or Allergic Eosinophilic Esophagitis? Case Series of Three Patients with Esophageal Eosinophilia. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00562.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.