The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Risk of Retention of the Capsule Endoscope in Patients with Known or Suspected Crohn's Disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Capsule endoscopy (CE) allows visualization of the mucosa of the entire small bowel and is therefore a potentially important tool in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease (CD). However, small bowel strictures, which are not uncommon in Crohn's, are considered to be a contraindication to CE for fear of capsule retention. Our goal was to determine the risk of capsule retention in patients with suspected or known CD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 983 CE cases performed at three private gastroenterology practices between December 2000 and December 2003, and selected those with suspected or proven Crohn's. RESULTS: A total of 102 cases were identified in which CE was used in patients with suspected (N = 64) or known (N = 38) CD. Only one of 64 patients (1.6%) with suspected CD had a retained capsule. However, in five of 38 (13%) patients with known Crohn's, the capsule was retained proximal to a stricture. Of the five cases of retained capsules, three strictures were previously unknown. In four cases, the obstructing lesions were resected without complications, leading to complete resolution of the patient's underlying symptoms. One patient chose not to undergo surgery and has remained without an episode of small bowel obstruction for over 38 months. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule retention occurred in 13% (95% CI 5.6%-28%) of patients with known CD, but only in 1.6% (95% CI 0.2%-10%) with suspected Crohn's. A retained capsule may indicate unsuspected strictures in Crohn's that may require an unexpected, but therapeutic, surgical intervention. Patients and physicians should be aware of these potential risks when using CE in CD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schiller, L. R., Pardi, D. S., Spiller, R., Semrad, C. E., Surawicz, C. M., Giannella, R. A., Krejs, G. J., Farthing, M. J. G., & Sellin, J. H. (2014) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1111/jgh.12392 · Cited by 95
Do Not Assume Symptoms Indicate Failure of Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Crohn's Disease
Bruining, D. H., & Sandborn, W. J. (2011) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.01.019 · Cited by 20
Endoscopy in IBD: when and how?
Daperno, M. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13223423 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheifetz, A. S., Kornbluth, A. A., Legnani, P., Schmelkin, I., Brown, A., Lichtiger, S., & Lewis, B. S.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2218-2222
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W1998851912
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.