The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of Childhood Constipation: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A systematic review of the published literature was performed to assess the prevalence, incidence, natural history, and comorbid conditions of functional constipation in children. METHODS: Articles were identified through electronic searches in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Library, Cinhal and PsychInfo databases. Study selection criteria included: (1) epidemiology studies of general population, (2) on the prevalence of constipation without obvious organic etiology, (3) in children from 0 to 18 yr old, and (4) published in English and full manuscript form. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. The prevalence of childhood constipation in the general population ranged from 0.7% to 29.6% (median 8.9; inter quartile range 5.3-17.4). The prevalence of constipation defined as defecation frequency of < 3/wk varied from 0.7% to 29.6% (median 10.4; inter quartile range 1.3-21.3). Identified studies originated from North America (N = 4), South America (N = 2), Europe (N = 9), the Middle-East (N = 1), and Asia (N = 2). Variance of gender specific prevalence was reported in seven studies and five of seven studies reported no significant difference between boys and girls. The age group in which constipation is most common could not be assessed with certainty. Socioeconomic factors were not found to be associated with constipation. CONCLUSION: Childhood constipation is a common problem worldwide. Most studies report similar prevalence rates for boys and girls. Large epidemiologic studies with the use of generally accepted diagnostic criteria are needed to define the precise prevalence of constipation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Holingue, C., Newill, C., Lee, L., Pasricha, P. J., & Daniele Fallin, M. (2018) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1854 · Cited by 296
Coccorullo, P., Strisciuglio, C., Martinelli, M., Miele, E., Greco, L., & Staiano, A. (2010) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.066 · Cited by 209
Pijpers, M. A. M., Tabbers, M. M., Benninga, M. A., & Berger, M. Y. (2008) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2007.127233 · Cited by 187
Self-citationKorterink, J. J., Ockeloen, L., Benninga, M. A., Tabbers, M. M., Hilbink, M., & Deckers‐Kocken, J. M. (2014) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.12513 · Cited by 115
Self-citationGuerra, P. V. (2011) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i34.3916 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Berg, M. M., Benninga, M. A., & Di Lorenzo, C.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2401-2409
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2142707382
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Childhood Constipation: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00771.x
- The paper
- van den Berg, M. M., Benninga, M. A., & Di Lorenzo, C. (2006). Epidemiology of Childhood Constipation: A Systematic Review. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00771.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.