Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 551

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Value of Serum IgG4 in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and in Distinguishing It From Pancreatic Cancer

Ghazale, Amaar, Chari, Suresh T., Smyrk, Thomas C., Levy, Michael J., Topazian, Mark D., Takahashi, Naoki, Clain, Jonathan E., Pearson, Randall K., Pelaez-Luna, Mario, Petersen, Bret T., Vege, Santhi Swaroop, Farnell, Michael B.·2007·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of elevated serum IgG4 level for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and its ability to distinguish AIP from pancreatic cancer, its main differential diagnosis. METHODS: We measured serum IgG4 levels (normal 8-140 mg/dL) in 510 patients including 45 with AIP, 135 with pancreatic cancer, 62 with no pancreatic disease, and 268 with other pancreatic diseases. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values for elevated serum IgG4 (>140 mg/dL) for diagnosis of AIP were 76%, 93%, and 36%, respectively, and 53%, 99%, and 75%, respectively, for IgG4 of >280 mg/dL. Among subjects with elevated IgG4, non-AIP subjects (N = 32) differed from AIP subjects (N = 34) in that they were more likely to be female (45%vs 9%, P < 0.001), less likely to have serum IgG4 >280 mg/dL (13%vs 71%, P < 0.001), or elevation of total IgG (16%vs 56%, P < 0.001). Serum IgG4 levels were elevated in 13/135 (10%) pancreatic cancer patients; however, only 1% had IgG4 levels >280 mg/dL compared with 53% of AIP. Compared with AIP, pancreatic cancer patients were more likely to have CA19-9 levels of >100 U/mL (71%vs 9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elevated serum IgG4 levels are characteristic of AIP. However, mild (<2-fold) elevations in serum IgG4 are seen in up to 10% of subjects without AIP including pancreatic cancer and cannot be used alone to distinguish AIP from pancreatic cancer. Because AIP is uncommon, IgG4 elevations in patients with low pretest probability of having AIP are likely to represent false positives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01264.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 551

Metadata

Authors
Ghazale, A., Chari, S. T., Smyrk, T. C., Levy, M. J., Topazian, M. D., Takahashi, N., Clain, J. E., Pearson, R. K., Pelaez-Luna, M., Petersen, B. T., Vege, S. S., & Farnell, M. B.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2007-08
Volume
102
Issue
8
Pages
1646-1653
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W1994675456
Cited by
551
References
0
FWCI
23.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value of Serum IgG4 in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and in Distinguishing It From Pancreatic Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01264.x
The paper
Ghazale, A., Chari, S. T., Smyrk, T. C., Levy, M. J., Topazian, M. D., Takahashi, N., Clain, J. E., Pearson, R. K., Pelaez-Luna, M., Petersen, B. T., Vege, S. S., & Farnell, M. B. (2007). Value of Serum IgG4 in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and in Distinguishing It From Pancreatic Cancer. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01264.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.