The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To provide health-care providers, patients, and physicians with an exhaustive assessment of prospective studies on rates of complications and fatalities associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1977-2006) for prospective surveys on adult patients undergoing ERCP. "Grey literature" was sought by looking at cited references to identify further relevant studies. Data on postprocedural pancreatitis, bleeding, infections, perforations, and miscellaneous events as well as their associated fatalities were extracted independently by two reviewers. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test for data consistency between multicenter versus single center studies, and old (1977-1996) versus recent (1997-2005) reports. RESULTS: In 21 selected surveys, involving 16,855 patients, ERCP-attributable complications totaled 1,154 (6.85%, CI 6.46-7.24%), with 55 fatalities (0.33%, CI 0.24-0.42%). Mild-to-moderate events occurred in 872 patients (5.17%, CI 4.83-5.51%), and severe events in 282 (1.67%, CI 1.47-1.87%). Pancreatitis occurred in 585 subjects (3.47%, CI 3.19-3.75%), infections in 242 (1.44%, CI 1.26-1.62%), bleeding in 226 (1.34%, CI 1.16-1.52%), and perforations in 101 (0.60%, CI 0.48-0.72%). Cardiovascular and/or analgesia-related complications amounted to 173 (1.33%, CI 1.13-1.53%), with 9 fatalities (0.07%, CI 0.02-0.12%). As compared with old reports, morbidity rates increased significantly in most recent studies: 6.27%versus 7.51% (P(c)= 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP remains the endoscopic procedure that carries a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Complications continue to occur at a relatively consistent rate. The majority of events are of mild-to-moderate severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases
European Association for the Study of the Liver (2009) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009 · Cited by 1,729
Panes, J., Bouhnik, Y., Reinisch, W., Stoker, J., Taylor, S. A., Baumgart, D. C., Danese, S., Halligan, S., Marincek, B., Matos, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.020 · Cited by 668
Aabakken, L., Karlsen, T., Albert, J., Arvanitakis, M., Chazouilleres, O., Dumonceau, J.-M., Färkkilä, M., Fickert, P., Hirschfield, G., Laghi, A., et al. (2017) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/s-0043-107029 · Cited by 255
Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in primary sclerosing cholangitis
Bangarulingam, S. Y., Gossard, A. A., Petersen, B. T., Ott, B. J., & Lindor, K. D. (2009) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2008.161 · Cited by 152
Aabakken, L., Karlsen, T. H., Albert, J., Arvanitakis, M., Chazouilleres, O., Dumonceau, J.-M., Färkkilä, M., Fickert, P., Hirschfield, G. M., Laghi, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.02.013 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Andriulli, A., Loperfido, S., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M. R., Spirito, F., Pilotto, A., & Forlano, R.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1781-1788
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2089115083
- Cited by
- 1,199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
- The paper
- Andriulli, A., Loperfido, S., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M. R., Spirito, F., Pilotto, A., & Forlano, R. (2007). Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.