Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies

Andriulli, Angelo, Loperfido, Silvano, Napolitano, Grazia, Niro, Grazia, Valvano, Maria Rosa, Spirito, Fulvio, Pilotto, Alberto, Forlano, Rosario·2007·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide health-care providers, patients, and physicians with an exhaustive assessment of prospective studies on rates of complications and fatalities associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1977-2006) for prospective surveys on adult patients undergoing ERCP. "Grey literature" was sought by looking at cited references to identify further relevant studies. Data on postprocedural pancreatitis, bleeding, infections, perforations, and miscellaneous events as well as their associated fatalities were extracted independently by two reviewers. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test for data consistency between multicenter versus single center studies, and old (1977-1996) versus recent (1997-2005) reports. RESULTS: In 21 selected surveys, involving 16,855 patients, ERCP-attributable complications totaled 1,154 (6.85%, CI 6.46-7.24%), with 55 fatalities (0.33%, CI 0.24-0.42%). Mild-to-moderate events occurred in 872 patients (5.17%, CI 4.83-5.51%), and severe events in 282 (1.67%, CI 1.47-1.87%). Pancreatitis occurred in 585 subjects (3.47%, CI 3.19-3.75%), infections in 242 (1.44%, CI 1.26-1.62%), bleeding in 226 (1.34%, CI 1.16-1.52%), and perforations in 101 (0.60%, CI 0.48-0.72%). Cardiovascular and/or analgesia-related complications amounted to 173 (1.33%, CI 1.13-1.53%), with 9 fatalities (0.07%, CI 0.02-0.12%). As compared with old reports, morbidity rates increased significantly in most recent studies: 6.27%versus 7.51% (P(c)= 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP remains the endoscopic procedure that carries a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Complications continue to occur at a relatively consistent rate. The majority of events are of mild-to-moderate severity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,199

Metadata

Authors
Andriulli, A., Loperfido, S., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M. R., Spirito, F., Pilotto, A., & Forlano, R.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2007-08
Volume
102
Issue
8
Pages
1781-1788
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2089115083
Cited by
1,199
References
0
FWCI
20.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
The paper
Andriulli, A., Loperfido, S., Napolitano, G., Niro, G., Valvano, M. R., Spirito, F., Pilotto, A., & Forlano, R. (2007). Incidence Rates of Post-ERCP Complications: A Systematic Survey of Prospective Studies. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.