Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 668

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 169 of the 169 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines

Open access
Panes, J., Bouhnik, Y., Reinisch, W., Stoker, J., Taylor, S.A., Baumgart, D.C., Danese, S., Halligan, S., Marincek, B., Matos, C., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Rimola, J., Rogler, G., van Assche, G., Ardizzone, S., Ba-Ssalamah, A., Bali, M.A., Bellini, D., Biancone, L., Castiglione, F., Ehehalt, R., Grassi, R., Kucharzik, T., Maccioni, F., Maconi, G., Magro, F., Martín-Comín, J., Morana, G., Pendsé, D., Sebastian, S., Signore, A., Tolan, D., Tielbeek, J.A., Weishaupt, D., Wiarda, B., Laghi, A.·2013·Journal of Crohn's and Colitis

Abstract

The management of patients with IBD requires evaluation with objective tools, both at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease, to determine the location, extension, activity and severity of inflammatory lesions, as well as, the potential existence of complications. Whereas endoscopy is a well-established and uniformly performed diagnostic examination, the implementation of radiologic techniques for assessment of IBD is still heterogeneous; variations in technical aspects and the degrees of experience and preferences exist across countries in Europe. ECCO and ESGAR scientific societies jointly elaborated a consensus to establish standards for imaging in IBD using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, ultrasonography, and including also other radiologic procedures such as conventional radiology or nuclear medicine examinations for different clinical situations that include general principles, upper GI tract, colon and rectum, perineum, liver and biliary tract, emergency situation, and the postoperative setting. The statements and general recommendations of this consensus are based on the highest level of evidence available, but significant gaps remain in certain areas such as the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between different techniques, the value for therapeutic monitoring, and the prognostic implications of particular findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.020

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 169 references

Cited by

See all 668

Metadata

Authors
Panes, J., Bouhnik, Y., Reinisch, W., Stoker, J., Taylor, S. A., Baumgart, D. C., Danese, S., Halligan, S., Marincek, B., Matos, C., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Rimola, J., Rogler, G., van Assche, G., Ardizzone, S., Ba-Ssalamah, A., Bali, M. A., Bellini, D., Biancone, L., Castiglione, F., Ehehalt, R., Grassi, R., Kucharzik, T., Maccioni, F., Maconi, G., Magro, F., Martín-Comín, J., Morana, G., Pendsé, D., Sebastian, S., Signore, A., Tolan, D., Tielbeek, J. A., Weishaupt, D., Wiarda, B., & Laghi, A.
Venue
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
556-585
ISSN
  • 1873-9946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-4479
OpenAlex
W1983046204
Cited by
668
References
169
FWCI
38.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.020
The paper
Panes, J., Bouhnik, Y., Reinisch, W., Stoker, J., Taylor, S. A., Baumgart, D. C., Danese, S., Halligan, S., Marincek, B., Matos, C., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Rimola, J., Rogler, G., van Assche, G., Ardizzone, S., Ba-Ssalamah, A., Bali, M. A., Bellini, D., Biancone, L., . . . Laghi, A. (2013). Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.