The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classifying Esophageal Motility by Pressure Topography Characteristics: A Study of 400 Patients and 75 Controls
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to devise a scheme for the systematic analysis of esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies displayed using topographic plotting. METHODS: A total of 400 patients and 75 control subjects were studied with a 36-channel HRM assembly. Studies were analyzed in a stepwise fashion for: (a) the adequacy of deglutitive esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation, (b) the presence and propagation characteristics of distal esophageal persitalsis, and (c) an integral of the magnitude and span of the distal esophageal contraction. RESULTS: Two strengths of pressure topography plots compared to conventional manometric recordings were: (a) the ability to delineate the spatial limits, vigor, and integrity of individual contractile segments along the esophagus, and (b) the ability to distinguish between loci of compartmentalized intraesophageal pressurization and rapidly propagated contractions. Making these distinctions objectified the identification of distal esophageal spasm (DES), vigorous achalasia, functional obstruction, and nutcracker esophagus subtypes. Applying these distinctions made the diagnosis of spastic disorders quite rare: (a) DES in 1.5% patients, (b) vigorous achalasia in 1.5%, and (c) a newly defined entity, spastic nutcracker, in 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a systematic approach to analyzing esophageal motility using HRM and pressure topography plots. The resultant scheme is consistent with conventional classifications with the caveats that: (a) hypercontractile conditions are more specifically defined, (b) distinctions are made between rapidly propagated contractions and compartmentalized esophageal pressurization, and (c) there is no "nonspecific esophageal motor disorder" classification. We expect that pressure topography analysis, with its well-defined functional implications, will prove valuable in the clinical management of esophageal motility disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Intestinal permeability and the prediction of relapse in Crohn's disease
Wyatt, J., Vogelsang, H., Hübl, W., Waldhoer, T., & Lochs, H. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)90882-h · Cited by 626
Cited by
Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice
Fox, M. R., & Bredenoord, A. J. (2008) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2007.127993 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandolfino, J. E., Ghosh, S. K., Rice, J., Clarke, J. O., Kwiatek, M. A., & Kahrilas, P. J.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-37
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2158037114
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classifying Esophageal Motility by Pressure Topography Characteristics: A Study of 400 Patients and 75 Controls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01532.x
- The paper
- Pandolfino, J. E., Ghosh, S. K., Rice, J., Clarke, J. O., Kwiatek, M. A., & Kahrilas, P. J. (2008). Classifying Esophageal Motility by Pressure Topography Characteristics: A Study of 400 Patients and 75 Controls. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01532.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.