The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease Treated With Metronidazole or Vancomycin Before and After the Emergence of NAP1/027
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To reassess the comparative efficacy of vancomycin versus metronidazole in the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) after the emergence in 2003 of the hypervirulent NAP1/027 strain. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary-care Canadian hospital among 1,616 patients treated initially with metronidazole (N=1,360), vancomycin (N=219), or both (N=37), between 1991 and 2006, and followed for 60 days after diagnosis. Primary outcome was severe/complicated CDAD (SC-CDAD) defined as any of: (a) death within 30 days, (b) septic shock, (c) megacolon, (d) perforation, or (e) emergency colectomy. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, stratifying into pre-epidemic (1991-2002) and epidemic (2003-2006) periods. Secondary outcome was recurrence within 60 days. RESULTS: Risk factors for SC-CDAD were the same in both periods: age>or=65 yr, male sex, immunosuppression, hospital acquisition, tube feeding, short duration of diarrhea, fever, elevated leukocytosis, or creatinine. Adjusting for confounders and using metronidazole therapy as baseline, vancomycin therapy was associated with a lower probability of developing SC-CDAD in 1991-2002 (AOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.99, P=0.048) but not during 2003-2006 (AOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.53-1.55, P=0.71). For both metronidazole and vancomycin, risk of recurrence increased in 2003-2004 but decreased in 2005-2006. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of superiority of vancomycin over metronidazole coincided with the emergence of NAP1/027. Toxin hyperproduction by NAP1/027 might be such that the disease follows its natural course. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed. The higher risk of recurrence in 2003-2004 probably reflected reinfections rather than relapses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Youngster, I., Russell, G. H., Pindar, C., Ziv-Baran, T., Sauk, J., & Hohmann, E. L. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13875 · Cited by 629
Cammarota, G., Masucci, L., Ianiro, G., Bibbò, S., Dinoi, G., Costamagna, G., Sanguinetti, M., & Gasbarrini, A. (2015) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13144 · Cited by 558
Youngster, I., Sauk, J., Pindar, C., Wilson, R. G., Kaplan, J. L., Smith, M. B., Alm, E. J., Gevers, D., Russell, G. H., & Hohmann, E. L. (2014) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciu135 · Cited by 467
Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridium difficile in Adults: A Systematic Review
Bagdasarian, N., Rao, K., & Malani, P. N. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.17103 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Pépin, J., Valiquette, L., Gagnon, S., Routhier, S., & Brazeau, I.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2781-2788
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W1974373854
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease Treated With Metronidazole or Vancomycin Before and After the Emergence of NAP1/027. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01539.x
- The paper
- Pépin, J., Valiquette, L., Gagnon, S., Routhier, S., & Brazeau, I. (2007). Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease Treated With Metronidazole or Vancomycin Before and After the Emergence of NAP1/027. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01539.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.