The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Risk of Oral Contraceptives in the Etiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Several environmental and genetic factors have been implicated to date in the development of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to provide a quantification of the risk of oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use in the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting on the association of oral contraceptive use in the etiology of UC and CD between 1983 and 2007. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to compare the incidence of UC or CD between the patients exposed to the OCP and nonexposed patients. The results were adjusted for smoking. RESULTS: A total of 75,815 patients were reported on by 14 studies, with 36,797 exposed to OCP and 39,018 nonexposed women. The pooled relative risk (RR) for CD for women currently taking the OCP was 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.96, P= 0.002), and 1.46 (95% CI 1.26-1.70, P < 0.001), adjusted for smoking. The RR for UC in women currently taking the OCP was 1.53 (95% CI 1.21-1.94, P= 0.001), and 1.28 (95% CI 1.06-1.54, P= 0.011), adjusted for smoking. The RR for CD increased with the length of exposure to OCP. Moreover, although the RR did not reduce once the OCP was stopped, it was no longer significant once the OCP was stopped (CI contains 1), both for CD and for UC. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of an association between the use of oral contraceptive agents and development of IBD, in particular CD. The study also suggests that the risk for patients who stop using the OCP reverts to that of the nonexposed population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Cited by
Epidemiology and risk factors for IBD
Ananthakrishnan, A. N. (2015) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2015.34 · Cited by 1,741
Shah, S. C., Khalili, H., Gower-Rousseau, C., Olen, O., Benchimol, E. I., Lynge, E., Nielsen, K. R., Brassard, P., Vutcovici, M., Bitton, A., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.043 · Cited by 286
The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in Denmark 1980–2013: a nationwide cohort study
Lophaven, S. N., Lynge, E., & Burisch, J. (2017) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13971 · Cited by 157
Jess, T., Frisch, M., Jørgensen, K. T., Pedersen, B. V., & Nielsen, N. M. (2012) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301095 · Cited by 148
Betteridge, J. D., Armbruster, S. P., Maydonovitch, C., & Veerappan, G. R. (2013) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1097/mib.0b013e318281334d · Cited by 123
A direct effect of sex hormones on epithelial barrier function in inflammatory bowel disease models
van der Giessen, J., van der Woude, C. J., Peppelenbosch, M. P., & Fuhler, G. M. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8030261 · Cited by 88
Variation in serum biomarkers with sex and female hormonal status: implications for clinical tests
Ramsey, J. M., Cooper, J. D., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Bahn, S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26947 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornish, J. A., Tan, E., Simillis, C., Clark, S. K., Teare, J., & Tekkis, P. P.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2394-2400
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W1972215874
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.