Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Patients on Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A Clinical Practice Recommendation From the First International Working Party on Gastrointestinal and Cardiovascular Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Anti-platelet Agents

Open access
Chan, Francis K.L., Abraham, Neena S., Scheiman, James M., Laine, Loren, for the First International Working Party on Gastrointestinal and Cardiovascular Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Anti-platelet Agents*·2008·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prescribing nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is challenging because physicians have to consider gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) safety issues. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine appropriate NSAID treatment strategies based on different combinations of GI and CV risks. METHODS: The working party comprised a multidisciplinary international panel of 19 experts. Two hundred eighty-eight vignettes were evaluated for the appropriateness of each of six options: naproxen, non-naproxen nonselective NSAIDs, naproxen plus proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/misoprostol, non-naproxen nonselective NSAID plus PPI/misoprostol, cyclooxygenase-2 selective NSAID (coxib), or coxib plus PPI/misoprostol. Using a two-stage modified Delphi process, the panel anonymously ranked the appropriateness of each option from 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Vignettes were considered appropriate if > or = 80% of all panelists' scores were 7-9 and inappropriate if > or = 80% of all panelists' scores were 1-3. RESULTS: The panel rated nonselective NSAIDs as appropriate when the patient had average GI risk (< 70 yr of age; no prior upper GI event; no corticosteroids, antithrombotic agents, anticoagulants). In patients with GI risk factors, cotherapy with a PPI/misoprostol was appropriate. Either a nonselective NSAID or a coxib was rated appropriate in patients with average CV risk; naproxen was preferred in patients with high CV risk. None of the options was considered appropriate in patients with multiple GI risk factors and high CV risk. CONCLUSIONS: The initial choice of an NSAID (naproxen vs. others) relates to a patient's CV risk, and the need for therapy to decrease GI complications (PPI/misoprostol or coxibs) is determined by severity and number of GI risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02200.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Chan, F. K. L., Abraham, N. S., Scheiman, J. M., Laine, L., & Agents*, F. T. F. I. W. P. O. G. A. C. E. O. N. A.-I. D. A. A.-P.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2008-11
Volume
103
Issue
11
Pages
2908-2918
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2133278537
Cited by
159
References
3
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Patients on Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A Clinical Practice Recommendation From the First International Working Party on Gastrointestinal and Cardiovascular Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Anti-platelet Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02200.x
The paper
Chan, F. K. L., Abraham, N. S., Scheiman, J. M., Laine, L., & Agents*, F. T. F. I. W. P. O. G. A. C. E. O. N. A.-I. D. A. A.-P. (2008). Management of Patients on Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A Clinical Practice Recommendation From the First International Working Party on Gastrointestinal and Cardiovascular Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Anti-platelet Agents. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02200.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.