Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 968

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models

Anselin, Luc·2002·Agricultural Economics

Abstract

This paper reviews a number of conceptual issues pertaining to the implementation of an explicit “spatial” perspective in applied econometrics. It provides an overview of the motivation for including spatial effects in regression models, both from a theory‐driven as well as from a data‐driven perspective. Considerable attention is paid to the inferential framework necessary to carry out estimation and testing and the different assumptions, constraints and implications embedded in the various specifications available in the literature. The review combines insights from the traditional spatial econometrics literature as well as from geostatistics, biostatistics and medical image analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 968

Metadata

Authors
Anselin, L.
Venue
Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
247-267
ISSN
  • 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-0862
OpenAlex
W4256053265
Cited by
968
References
3
FWCI
26.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x
The paper
Anselin, L. (2002). Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.