The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do farmers benefit from participating in specialty markets and cooperatives? The case of coffee marketing in Costa Rica1
Abstract
Historically low prices in the conventional coffee market have caused financial and social hardship among coffee farmers. In the face of this crisis, specialty markets have attracted the attention of the international donor community. These market segments have shown consistent growth over the last decade and exhibit price premiums in international markets. Therefore, if higher prices are passed on to farmers, access to specialty markets could help to alleviate the crisis brought on by low prices in the conventional sector. The present study attempts to identify the factors that determine farmers' participation in specialized markets and whether participation in these markets leads to higher prices for farmers. A two‐stage model is used to analyze farmers' marketing decisions and their effect on the prices received. This procedure allows us to control for the endogeneity bias introduced by the marketing choice. Our results indicate that farmers participating in the specialty coffee segment do in fact receive higher prices than those participating in conventional channels. Additionally, we find that participation in cooperatives has a positive impact on the probability that a farmer chooses to grow specialty coffee and analogously on the prices that they receive. Based on these results, it seems that efforts to increase participation in the specialty coffee segment and in cooperatives would help to lessen some of the hardships brought on by low prices in the conventional coffee sector.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya
Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018 · Cited by 836
Mojo, D., Fischer, C., & Degefa, T. (2017) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.010 · Cited by 382
Yao, R., Heinrich, M., Wang, Z., & Weckerle, C. S. (2018) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2018.06.010 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Wollni, M., & Zeller, M.
- Venue
- Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 243-248
- ISSN
- 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-0862
- OpenAlex
- W2151502806
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do farmers benefit from participating in specialty markets and cooperatives? The case of coffee marketing in Costa Rica1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00270.x
- The paper
- Wollni, M., & Zeller, M. (2007). Do farmers benefit from participating in specialty markets and cooperatives? The case of coffee marketing in Costa Rica1. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00270.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.