The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technology adoption under seed access constraints and the economic impacts of improved pigeonpea varieties in Tanzania
Abstract
Dry‐land legumes, well adapted to drought‐prone areas, have largely been neglected in the past despite the good opportunities they offer for income growth and food (and nutritional) security for the poor. This study evaluated the adoption and impact of two farmer and market‐preferred and disease‐resistant pigeonpea varieties that were developed and promoted in semi‐arid Tanzania. The new varieties were resistant to fusarium wilt, a fungal disease devastating the crop. However, farmers wanting to adopt new varieties did not adopt due to seed access constraints and under‐developed seed delivery systems. Adoption of new varieties is therefore analyzed using an augmented double hurdle model that allows estimating variety adoption conditional on seed access thresholds accounting for the additional information on sample separation. The study identifies the crucial role of seed access (local supply), extension, education, participatory decision making, capital, and household assets in determining adoption. The social economic benefits of the technology and policies for improved seed access were further analyzed using the extended economic surplus method (DREAM model). Even under restrictive assumptions, overall discounted benefits were found to be quite attractive, indicating the need for additional efforts to scale‐up the success story. Analysis of changes in research benefits from relaxing the seed access constraint showed that net gains would increase by up to 30% if farmer access to improved seeds can be assured. Smallholder farmers are the major beneficiaries along with consumers and rural net‐buyers who gain from productivity‐induced lower market prices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia
Abebaw, D., & Haile, M. G. (2013) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.10.003 · Cited by 623
Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics
(2026) · Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics · doi:10.5897/jdae · Cited by 465
Seeing is believing? Evidence from an extension network experiment
Kondylis, F., Mueller, V., & Zhu, J. (2017) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.10.004 · Cited by 191
Nawrotzki, R. J., Riosmena, F., & Hunter, L. M. (2013) · Population Research and Policy Review · doi:10.1007/s11113-012-9251-8 · Cited by 134
Kruseman, G., Bairagi, S., Komarek, A. M., Molero Milan, A., Nedumaran, S., Petsakos, A., Prager, S., & Yigezu, Y. A. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20114 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiferaw, B. A., Kebede, T. A., & You, L.
- Venue
- Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-323
- ISSN
- 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-0862
- OpenAlex
- W2021880074
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology adoption under seed access constraints and the economic impacts of improved pigeonpea varieties in Tanzania. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00335.x
- The paper
- Shiferaw, B. A., Kebede, T. A., & You, L. (2008). Technology adoption under seed access constraints and the economic impacts of improved pigeonpea varieties in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00335.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.