The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic comparisons of a coastal bacterioplankton community with its counterparts in open ocean and freshwater systems
Open accessAbstract
In order to extend previous comparisons between coastal marine bacterioplankton communities and their open ocean and freshwater counterparts, here we summarize and provide new data on a clone library of 105 SSU rRNA genes recovered from seawater collected over the western continental shelf of the USA in the Pacific Ocean. Comparisons to previously published data revealed that this coastal bacterioplankton clone library was dominated by SSU rRNA gene phylotypes originally described from surface waters of the open ocean, but also revealed unique SSU rRNA gene lineages of beta Proteobacteria related to those found in clone libraries from freshwater habitats. beta Proteobacteria lineages common to coastal and freshwater samples included members of a clade of obligately methylotrophic bacteria, SSU rRNA genes affiliated with Xylophilus ampelinus, and a clade related to the genus Duganella. In addition, SSU rRNA genes were recovered from such previously recognized marine bacterioplankton SSU rRNA gene clone clusters as the SAR86, SAR11, and SAR116 clusters within the class Proteobacteria, the Roseobacter clade of the alpha subclass of the Proteobacteria, the marine group A/SAR406 cluster, and the marine Actinobacteria clade. Overall, these results support and extend previous observations concerning the global distribution of several marine planktonic prokaryote SSU rRNA gene phylotypes, but also show that coastal bacterioplankton communities contain SSU rRNA gene lineages (and presumably bacterioplankton) shown previously to be prevalent in freshwater habitats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Cited by
Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea
Herlemann, D. P. R., Labrenz, M., Jürgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J. J., & Andersson, A. F. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.41 · Cited by 2,885
The Uncultured Microbial Majority
Rappé, M. S., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759 · Cited by 2,017
Self-citationGlobal patterns of bacterial beta-diversity in seafloor and seawater ecosystems
Zinger, L., Amaral-Zettler, L. A., Fuhrman, J. A., Horner-Devine, M. C., Huse, S. M., Welch, D. B. M., Martiny, J. B. H., Sogin, M., Boetius, A., & Ramette, A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024570 · Cited by 643
Global patterns of diversity and community structure in marine bacterioplankton
POMMIER, T., CANBÄCK, B., RIEMANN, L., BOSTRÖM, K. H., SIMU, K., LUNDBERG, P., TUNLID, A., & HAGSTRÖM, Å. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03189.x · Cited by 466
Diversification and spectral tuning in marine proteorhodopsins
Man, D. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg183 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Rappé, M. S., Vergin, K., & Giovannoni, S. J.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-232
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W2116371064
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic comparisons of a coastal bacterioplankton community with its counterparts in open ocean and freshwater systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00744.x
- The paper
- Rappé, M. S., Vergin, K., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2000). Phylogenetic comparisons of a coastal bacterioplankton community with its counterparts in open ocean and freshwater systems. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00744.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.