The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellâcell signalling in bacteria: not simply a matter of quorum
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial signalling known as quorum sensing (QS) relies on the synthesis of autoinducing signals throughout growth; when a threshold concentration is reached, these signals interact with a transcriptional regulator, allowing the expression of specific genes at a high cell density. One of the most studied intraspecies signalling is based on the use of N-acyl-homoserine lactones (AHL). Many factors other than cell density were shown to affect AHL accumulation and interfere with the QS signalling process. At the cellular level, the genetic determinants of QS are integrated in a complex regulatory network, including QS cascades and various transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators that affect the synthesis of the AHL signal. In complex environments where bacteria exist, AHL do not accumulate at a constant rate; the diffusion and perception of the AHL signal outside bacterial cells can be compromised by abiotic environmental factors, by members of the bacterial community such as AHL-degrading bacteria and also by compounds produced by eukaryotes acting as an AHL mimic or inhibitor. This review aims to present all factors interfering with the AHL-mediated signalling process, at the levels of signal production, diffusion and perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mylona, P., Pawlowski, K., & Bisseling, T. (1995) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.7.7.869 · Cited by 692
Cited by
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning
Vacheron, J., Desbrosses, G., Bouffaud, M.-L., Touraine, B., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., Muller, D., Legendre, L., Wisniewski-Dyé, F., & Prigent-Combaret, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00356 · Cited by 1,524
Self-citationPathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex
Genin, S., & Denny, T. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000 · Cited by 666
Cuthbertson, L., & Nodwell, J. R. (2013) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00018-13 · Cited by 554
Merging mythology and morphology: the multifaceted lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis
Armbruster, C. E., & Mobley, H. L. T. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2890 · Cited by 305
Metabolic cross-feeding via intercellular nanotubes among bacteria
Pande, S., Shitut, S., Freund, L., Westermann, M., Bertels, F., Colesie, C., Bischofs, I. B., & Kost, C. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7238 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyer, M., & Wisniewski-Dyé, F.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W1593038806
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellâcell signalling in bacteria: not simply a matter of quorum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00745.x
- The paper
- Boyer, M., & Wisniewski-Dyé, F. (2009). Cellâcell signalling in bacteria: not simply a matter of quorum. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00745.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.