The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alkaliphiles: Ecology, diversity and applications
Abstract
Organisms with pH optima for growth in excess of pH8, usually between 9 and 10, are properly defined as alkaliphiles (or sometimes alkalophiles). Most of the organisms described to date as growing under very alkaline conditions are prokaryotes, comprising a heterogeneous collection of eubacteria (including cyanobacteria) with a few examples of archaebacteria. With the exception of the alkaliphilic archaebacteria (which are also halophilic), few of the isolates have been comprehensively classified. However, it is clearly that may different taxa are represented amongst the alkaliphiles, and that some of these at least are likely to be new taxa. Alkaliphiles can be isolated from ‘normal’ environments such as garde soil, presumably because there are transient alkaline conditions generated in such environments by biological activity, but a relatively restricted range of types results from the exploration of such environments (often Bacillus spp.). Naturally-occurring stable alkaline environments such as eutrophic soda (Na2CO3) lakes harbour a much wider range of types. A similarity wide range of types may exist in oligotrophic Ca(OH)2-dominated ground water in certain parts of the world. Alkaliphilic microorganisms have already made a large impact in the application of biotechnology for the manufacture of mass market consumer products. “Biological detergents” contain enzymes that have usually been obtained from alkaliphilic or alkalitolerant bacteria. The current proportion of total world enzyme production destined for the laundry detergents market comfortably exceeds 25%, and there are other possible applications in food and waste treatment industies. To date, most commercially available enzymes are derived from a few bacterial taxa (notably Bacillus spp.) and we have been very conservative in our choice of environments in which to look for new products. It is reasonable to suppose that soda lakes (and other alkaline environments) will yield a wealth of new organisms with useful commercial properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grant, W. D. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1502 · Cited by 531
Self-citationMicrobial diversity and biogeochemical cycling in soda lakes
Sorokin, D. Y., Berben, T., Melton, E. D., Overmars, L., Vavourakis, C. D., & Muyzer, G. (2014) · Extremophiles · doi:10.1007/s00792-014-0670-9 · Cited by 344
JIMENEZ, C. (2003) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(03)00123-6 · Cited by 219
Hendrickx, L., De Wever, H., Hermans, V., Mastroleo, F., Morin, N., Wilmotte, A., Janssen, P., & Mergeay, M. (2006) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2005.06.014 · Cited by 181
(2010) · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, W. D., Mwatha, W. E., & Jones, B. E.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 255-269
- ISSN
- 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6968
- OpenAlex
- W2114363486
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alkaliphiles: Ecology, diversity and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04099.x
- The paper
- Grant, W. D., Mwatha, W. E., & Jones, B. E. (1990). Alkaliphiles: Ecology, diversity and applications. FEMS Microbiology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04099.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.