Cited by 219Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Relationship between physicochemical variables and productivity in open ponds for the production of Spirulina: A predictive model of algal yield

JIMENEZ, C·2003·Aquaculture

Abstract

Spirulina is one of the most extensively used microalgae for animal and human nutrition; its main interest is centered in its high protein content, 60-65% on a dry weight basis. In this study, Spirulina was grown in open raceway ponds, and several physicochemical (e.g., pH, dissolved oxygen concentration, temperature, conductivity and irradiance) and biological (e.g., biomass concentration and yield) variables were studied. The variables were correlated in order to implement a mathematical model to predict algal yield. Dissolved oxygen concentration in the cultivation ponds ranged between 10 mg l-1 in winter (115% of O2 saturation) and 30 mg l-1 in summer (375% of O2 saturation); a clear decrease of biomass concentration was found when dissolved oxygen was >25 mg l-1. Neither biomass concentration nor productivity was saturated at the maximum temperature achieved in the open pond during this study (approximately 28 °C). The pH seemed to control both the maximal algal density in the pond and the productivity that were found to be maximum at pH values below 10.5. Finally, all the variables were positively correlated with irradiance. Principal component analysis (PCA) allowed recognition of different sets of samples characterized by a combination of temperature, dissolved oxygen concentration, pH, biomass, productivity, irradiance and conductivity. This method helped to predict a significant loss of productivity in the open ponds in mid-summer due to high pH and high-dissolved O2 concentration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0044-8486(03)00123-6

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JIMENEZ, C.
Venue
Aquaculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
221
Issue
1-4
Pages
331-345
ISSN
0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156415472
Cited by
219
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidad de Málaga
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
Spirulina, microalgae cultivation, raceway ponds, dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, irradiance, conductivity, biomass concentration, productivity, seasonal variation, principal component analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review