The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How many species are infected with Wolbachia? â a statistical analysis of current data: Wolbachia infection rates
Open accessAbstract
Wolbachia are intracellular bacteria found in many species of arthropods and nematodes. They manipulate the reproduction of their arthropod hosts in various ways, may play a role in host speciation and have potential applications in biological pest control. Estimates suggest that at least 20% of all insect species are infected with Wolbachia. These estimates result from several Wolbachia screenings in which numerous species were tested for infection; however, tests were mostly performed on only one to two individuals per species. The actual percent of species infected will depend on the distribution of infection frequencies among species. We present a meta-analysis that estimates percentage of infected species based on data on the distribution of infection levels among species. We used a beta-binomial model that describes the distribution of infection frequencies of Wolbachia, shedding light on the overall infection rate as well as on the infection frequency within species. Our main findings are that (1) the proportion of Wolbachia-infected species is estimated to be 66%, and that (2) within species the infection frequency follows a 'most-or-few' infection pattern in a sense that the Wolbachia infection frequency within one species is typically either very high (>90%) or very low (<10%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology and Evolution of Microbes that Manipulate Host Reproduction
Engelstädter, J., & Hurst, G. D. D. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120206 · Cited by 555
Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation
Werren, J. H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102343108 · Cited by 444
Self-citationBeyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem
McGraw, E. A., & O'Neill, S. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2968 · Cited by 381
Bacterial symbionts in insects or the story of communities affecting communities
Ferrari, J., & Vavre, F. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0226 · Cited by 334
Bouchon, D., Zimmer, M., & Dittmer, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01472 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Hilgenboecker, K., Hammerstein, P., Schlattmann, P., Telschow, A., & Werren, J. H.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-220
- ISSN
- 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6968
- OpenAlex
- W1592352451
- Cited by
- 1,334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 85.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How many species are infected with Wolbachia? â a statistical analysis of current data: Wolbachia infection rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01110.x
- The paper
- Hilgenboecker, K., Hammerstein, P., Schlattmann, P., Telschow, A., & Werren, J. H. (2008). How many species are infected with Wolbachia? â a statistical analysis of current data: Wolbachia infection rates. FEMS Microbiology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01110.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.