The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria
Open accessAbstract
In microbial fuel cells and electrolysis cells (MXCs), anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) oxidize organic substrates to produce electrical current. In order to develop an electrical current, ARB must transfer electrons to a solid anode through extracellular electron transfer (EET). ARB use various EET mechanisms to transfer electrons to the anode, including direct contact through outer-membrane proteins, diffusion of soluble electron shuttles, and electron transport through solid components of the extracellular biofilm matrix. In this review, we perform a novel kinetic analysis of each EET mechanism by analyzing the results available in the literature. Our goal is to evaluate how well each EET mechanism can produce a high current density (> 10 A m(-2)) without a large anode potential loss (less than a few hundred millivolts), which are feasibility goals of MXCs. Direct contact of ARB to the anode cannot achieve high current densities due to the limited number of cells that can come in direct contact with the anode. Slow diffusive flux of electron shuttles at commonly observed concentrations limits current generation and results in high potential losses, as has been observed experimentally. Only electron transport through a solid conductive matrix can explain observations of high current densities and low anode potential losses. Thus, a study of the biological components that create a solid conductive matrix is of critical importance for understanding the function of ARB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration
Lovley, D. R., Coates, J. D., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Phillips, E. J. P., & Woodward, J. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382445a0 · Cited by 1,834
Lovley, D. R., Giovannoni, S. J., White, D. C., Champine, J. E., Phillips, E. J. P., Gorby, Y. A., & Goodwin, S. (1993) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00290916 · Cited by 983
Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms
Rittmann, B. E. (2008) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21875 · Cited by 651
Self-citationMechanisms for Fe(III) Oxide Reduction in Sedimentary Environments
Nevin, K. P., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Geomicrobiology Journal · doi:10.1080/01490450252864253 · Cited by 330
Cited by
Microbial Nanowires: A New Paradigm for Biological Electron Transfer and Bioelectronics
Malvankar, N. S., & Lovley, D. R. (2012) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201100733 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Torres, C. I., Marcus, A. K., Lee, H.-S., Parameswaran, P., Krajmalnik-Brown, R., & Rittmann, B. E.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-17
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2052747946
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 29.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00191.x
- The paper
- Torres, C. I., Marcus, A. K., Lee, H.-S., Parameswaran, P., Krajmalnik-Brown, R., & Rittmann, B. E. (2010). A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00191.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.