Cited by 651Algal biology and biofuel productionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms

Open access
Rittmann, Bruce E.·2008·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Global warming can be slowed, and perhaps reversed, only when society replaces fossil fuels with renewable, carbon‐neutral alternatives. The best option is bioenergy: the sun's energy is captured in biomass and converted to energy forms useful to modern society. To make a dent in global warming, bioenergy must be generated at a very high rate, since the world today uses ∼10 TW of fossil‐fuel energy. And, it must do so without inflicting serious damage on the environment or disrupting our food supply. While most bioenergy options fail on both counts, several microorganism‐based options have the potential to produce large amounts of renewable energy without disruptions. In one approach, microbial communities convert the energy value of various biomass residuals to socially useful energy. Biomass residuals come from agricultural, animal, and a variety of industrial operations, as well as from human wastes. Microorganisms can convert almost all of the energy in these wastes to methane, hydrogen, and electricity. In a second approach, photosynthetic microorganisms convert sunlight into biodiesel. Certain algae (eukaryotes) or cyanobacteria (prokaryotes) have high lipid contents. Under proper conditions, these photosynthetic microorganisms can produce lipids for biodiesel with yields per unit area 100 times or more than possible with any plant system. In addition, the non‐lipid biomass can be converted to methane, hydrogen, or electricity. Photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land, an advantage because our arable land must be used to produce food. Algae or cyanobacteria may be the best option to produce bioenergy at rates high enough to replace a substantial fraction of our society's use of fossil fuels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008;99: 203–212. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Microorganism-based bioenergy can potentially replace a substantial fraction of fossil fuels by converting residual biomass to methane, hydrogen, or electricity and by producing biodiesel from photosynthetic microorganisms. The paper argues that these options are among the few bioenergy pathways that could scale to ~10 TW without competing with food crops or causing major environmental harm.

Key findings

  • Residual biomass conversion could contribute significantly: U.S. residual biomass energy value is estimated at 0.2–0.3 TW, about 7% of U.S. total annual energy use (~3.3 TW), and perhaps 25% or more worldwide.
  • Photosynthetic microorganisms can yield lipids for biodiesel at roughly 100-fold higher areal rates than plants: ~100,000 L ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ versus <1,000 L ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ for high-lipid plants such as soybeans and sunflowers.
  • Microbial fuel cells have improved rapidly, with highest current density ~12 A/m² of anode area and power densities up to ~2.4 W/m², but are still far from commercially viable rates.
  • Microbial electrolytic cells can convert biomass fermentation products to H₂ with net energy conversion around 80%, potentially overcoming low H₂ yields from fermentation alone (practical yield ~2 mol H₂/mol glucose versus maximum 4 mol H₂/mol glucose).

Methods

  • Design: Perspectives/review article, not a primary experimental study; it synthesizes literature and compares bioenergy options.
  • Data/sample: Uses cited studies, tables comparing biomass-energy options and plants versus photosynthetic microorganisms, and simple scale calculations (e.g., land area needed for corn ethanol to replace petroleum).
  • Main analysis: Qualitative technology assessment plus quantitative estimates of energy yields, conversion efficiencies, and scale requirements.

Limitations

  • Stated: Many microbial options are immature or nascent; pretreatment is not ideal; MFCs are not fast enough for commercial viability; methanogenesis cost is still high versus natural gas; it is too early to judge algae versus cyanobacteria or open ponds versus photobioreactors.
  • Stated: Microbial biodiesel faces challenges in siting, water management, CO₂ supply, and cost competitiveness.
  • Evident: As a Perspectives article, it relies on cited literature and projections rather than new experimental data, and several future-scale claims depend on technological improvements that the paper says are not yet achieved.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.21875

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 48 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    The main drawback of fermentation to H2 today is that only a small fraction of the electrons in the starting organic material ends up in H2, even when the starting material is pure glucose.

    “Although fermentation to H 2 is straightforward, the main drawback today is that only a small fraction of the electrons in the starting organic material ends up in H 2 .This is true even when the starting material is pure glucose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Both algae and cyanobacteria can accumulate high levels of lipids, for example, ~25% in wild-type strains.

    “Both types of photosynthetic microorganisms can accumulate high levels of lipids, for example, $25% in wild-type strains (Ahlgren et al., 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ahlgren et al., 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Power densities have increased similarly, up to 2.4 W/m2, in the same period.

    “Likewise, power densities have increased similarly, up to $2.4 W/m 2 , in the same period (Cheng and Logan, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cheng and Logan, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning

    Because the net energy output of corn-to-ethanol is only about 10%, the entire land surface area of the planet would be needed to supplant current petroleum use.

    “However, the situation is not so favorable, because the net energy output of corn-toethanol is only about 10%, which says that the entire land surface area of the planet would be needed to supplant our current use of petroleum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Vermaas and colleagues have produced a single-gene mutant of Synechocystis that accumulates up to 50% of its dry weight in lipids.

    “For example, Vermaas and colleagues (W.Vermaas, personal communication) have produced a single-gene mutant of Synechocystis that accumulates up to 50% of its dry weight in lipids.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites W. Vermaas, personal communication

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 40
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In an MEC, the energy output is H2, not electricity; a small amount of electrical energy is consumed to boost the potential high enough to produce H2 at the cathode; the net energy conversion to H2 is around 80%.

    “In an MEC, the energy output is H 2 , not electricity.In fact, a small amount of electrical energy is consumed to boost the potential high enough to produce H 2 at the cathode (Cheng and Logan, 2007).In the end, the net energy conversion to H 2 is around 80% (Cheng and Logan, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cheng and Logan, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The highest current density to date is 12 A/m2 of anode area, which is more than 10 times larger than typical rates only 5 years ago.

    “the highest current density to date, $12 A/m 2 of anode area”
    • Also stated in: § Rittmann: Bioenergy Opportunities Using Microorganisms 207 · plain
      “is more than 10 times larger than typical rates only 5 years ago (Lee et al., 2008a;Rittmann et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2008a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rittmann et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Photosynthetic microorganisms (algae or cyanobacteria) offer many significant advantages over high-oil plants for producing lipids for biodiesel, the most important being a roughly 100-fold higher yield of lipids per hectare.

    “While high-oil plants are a good source of lipids for conversion to biodiesel, photosynthetic microorganisms (algae or cyanobacteria) offer many significant advantages.The most important one is the last row in the table: a roughly 100-fold higher yield of lipids per hectare.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huber et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To make a dent in global warming, bioenergy must be generated at a very high rate, since the world today uses $10 TW of fossil-fuel energy.

    “To make a dent in global warming, bioenergy must be generated at a very high rate, since the world today uses $10 TW of fossil-fuel energy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    It is the third risk (global climate change) that will have the most long-lasting and profound impact.

    “Although the portent of catastrophe may seem more immediate from the first two risks, it is the third risk that will have the most long-lasting and profound impact.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    We have the potential to reduce, or perhaps even eliminate, the third risk by converting to renewable, carbon-neutral energy sources that provide the energy services now obtained from fossil fuels.

    “Fortunately, we have the potential to reduce, or perhaps even eliminate, the third risk by converting to renewable, carbon-neutral energy sources that provide the energy services now obtained from fossil fuels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Bioenergy must be generated without inflicting serious damage on the environment or disrupting our food supply.

    “And, it must do so without inflicting serious damage on the environment or disrupting our food supply.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Certain algae (eukaryotes) or cyanobacteria (prokaryotes) have high lipid contents.

    “Certain algae (eukaryotes) or cyanobacteria (prokaryotes) have high lipid contents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    All photosynthesis on earth today captures about 140 TW of energy as biomass, only about 10 times today's energy demand of human society.

    “On the other hand, all photosynthesis on earth today captures about 140 TW of energy as biomass (Hall and Rosillo-Calle, 1998); this is only about 10 times today's energy demand of human society.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hall and Rosillo-Calle, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fossil fuel consumption will rise by 60% or so in the next 25 years unless we can replace it on a very large scale.

    “The fossil fuel we consume today is a very large amount, and our consumption will rise by 60% or so in the next 25 years unless we can replace it on a very large scale (Energy Information Administration, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Energy Information Administration, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Combustion of fossil fuels is adding about 6 Gton of carbon per year to the atmosphere as CO2.

    “Combustion of fossil fuels is adding about 6 gigatons (Gton ¼ 10 9 tons) per year of C (in the form of CO 2 ) to the atmosphere each year (IPCC, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IPCC, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Global warming can be slowed, and perhaps reversed, only when society replaces fossil fuels with renewable, carbon-neutral alternatives.

    “Global warming can be slowed, and perhaps reversed, only when society replaces fossil fuels with renewable, carbon-neutral alternatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The ultimate source of energy in biomass is sunlight; photosynthesis captures the sun's energy and invests it in organic molecules.

    “The second principle is that the ultimate source of energy is sunlight; photosynthesis captures the sun's energy and invests it in organic molecules, which are the carriers of the electrons and their energy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Total incident solar energy reaching the earth's surface is about 173,000 TW, which is 17,000 times what humans consume in fossil fuels.

    “On the one hand, the total incident solar energy reaching the earth's surface is plentiful: $173,000 TW (Goldemberg and Johansson, 2004), which is 17,000 times what humans consume in fossil fuels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldemberg and Johansson, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    If CO2 concentration continues to rise through 2100, average temperatures could rise by more than 3°C, ocean levels could rise up to 80 cm, most lake and reservoir levels will decline, extreme weather events will occur more frequently, and disease transmission may become more prevalent.

    “Should the CO 2 concentration continue to rise through 2100, average temperatures could rise by more than 38C, ocean levels could rise up to 80 cm (nearly 3 feet), most lake and reservoir levels will decline, extreme weather events (e.g., hurricanes, drought, and flooding) will occur more frequently, and disease transmission may become more prevalent (IPCC, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IPCC, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Human society consumes about 13 TW of energy worldwide, and approximately 80% of that comes from burning fossil fuels.

    “We now consume about 13 terrawatts (1 TW ¼ 10 12 W¼3.2EJ/year) of energy worldwide, and approximately 80% of that comes from burning fossil fuels (Goldemberg and Johansson, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldemberg and Johansson, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Switching the source of biomass away from food crops to cellulosics, like switchgrass, could improve the energy output and lower the negative environmental costs.

    “Switching the source of biomass away from food crops to cellulosics, like switchgrass, could improve the energy output and lower the negative environmental costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    H2 has the added benefit that it can be used as fuel for a conventional fuel cell, producing pollution-free electrical energy with an efficiency at least 50% higher than with a combustion-steam-turbine approach.

    “However, H 2 has the very large added benefit that it can be used as the fuel for a conventional fuel cell, where electricity can be produced without combustion, producing pollution-free electrical energy with an efficiency at least 50% higher than with a combustion-steam-turbine approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Today H2 gas is a large and mature industry, but virtually all hydrogen comes from reforming fossil fuels.

    “Today, H 2 gas is a large and mature industry (about 10 8 m 3 /year in the United States), but virtually all of our hydrogen comes from reforming fossil fuels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An ideal technology for pretreatment is not yet at hand, and this places limits on what we can obtain from energy-conversion schemes.

    “Hence, an ideal technology for pre-treatment is not yet at hand, and this places limits on the what we can obtain from energyconversion schemes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While direct contact of ARB with the anode may play a role, large-scale electron transfer uses soluble electron shuttles, conduction through the biofilm matrix, or a combination.

    “While it is possible that direct contact of the ARB with the anode can play a role, large-scale electron transfer uses soluble electron shuttles, conduction through the biofilm matrix, or a combination (reviewed in Kato Marcus et al., 2007;Rabaey et al., 2005;Rittmann, 2006;Rittmann et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kato Marcus et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rabaey et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rittmann, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Converting high-lipid plants to biodiesel has a higher net energy yield than converting crops to ethanol or butanol, because the long-chain aliphatics that comprise biodiesel are naturally immiscible in water.

    “The net energy yield is higher this way than when converting crops to ethanol or butanol, since the long-chain aliphatics that comprise biodiesel are naturally immiscible in water.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Methanogenesis constitutes a mature technology that can be adapted to most forms of residual biomass.

    “It constitutes a mature technology that can be adapted to most forms of residual biomass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When combined with the fact that photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land and need not compete with food production, the ~100-fold higher yield means that microbial biodiesel has the potential to displace large amounts of fossil fuel for powering automobiles, trucks, airplanes, and power plants.

    “When combined with the fact that photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land and need not compete with food production, the factor of $100-fold higher yield means that microbial biodiesel has the potential to displace large amounts of fossil fuel for powering automobiles, trucks, airplanes, and power plants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land and need not compete with food production.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Biodiesel directly replaces petroleum-based diesel fuel for transportation and other uses that demand a very high-density fuel.

    “Biodiesel directly replaces petroleum-based diesel fuel for transportation and other uses that demand a very highdensity fuel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    A conversion process today may capture 50% of the energy value from most residues.

    “A conversion process today may capture 50% of the energy value from most residues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The concept of the MFC is proven, and making bioelectricity from organic fuel is not difficult.

    “Thus, the concept of the MFC is proven, and making bioelectricity from organic fuel is not difficult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sunflowers can produce up to about 1 m3 of lipids per hectare-year, but land cultivable in high-lipid plants is limited.

    “Sunflowers can produce up to about 1 m 3 of lipids per hectare-year (Huber et al., 2006), but land cultivable in highlipid plants is limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huber et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Even if the technological barriers to cellulosic ethanol or bioethanol are overcome, they still will have only a small impact on reducing fossil-fuel consumption.

    “Even if the technological barriers to cellulosic ethanol or bioethanol are overcome, they still will have only a small impact on reducing fossil-fuel consumption”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Once organic matter is bioavailable, a good conversion process captures almost 100% of the electrons in a useful energy output.

    “Once the organic matter is bioavailable, a good conversion process captures almost 100% of the electrons in a useful energy output.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    An MFC is a special form of a fuel cell in which bacteria grow as a biofilm on the anode, catalyze the oxidation of organic compounds in or derived from biomass, and transfer electrons to the anode.

    “As illustrated in Figure 2, an MFC is a special form of a fuel cell in which bacteria grow as a biofilm on the anode.The bacteria catalyze the oxidation of organic compounds either in or derived from biomass (after it has gone through fermentation), and the bacteria then transfer the electrons to the anode.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Energy yield must increase by orders of magnitude over corn-to-ethanol to meet the goal of replacing petroleum use; a factor of 3 or 10 is too little.

    “Clearly, energy yield must increase by orders of magnitude over corn-to-ethanol if we are to meet the goal of replacing petroleum use; a factor of 3 or 10 is simply too little.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Changing the electron acceptor at the cathode from O2 to H+ allows H2 to be generated at the cathode, and this form of an MFC is called a microbial electrolytic cell (MEC).

    “Among the most interesting opportunities is to change the electron acceptor at the cathode from O 2 to H þ .As is illustrated in Figure 3, this change allows H 2 to be generated at the cathode (Cheng and Logan, 2007;Lee et al., 2008a;Torres et al., 2007), and this form of an MFC is called a microbial electrolytic cell, or MEC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cheng and Logan, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lee et al., 2008a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Torres et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The challenge is to make bioelectricity at a fast enough rate that the capital costs of the MFC are offset by the value of the energy output; today's MFCs are far from fast enough to be commercially viable.

    “The challenge is to make bioelectricity at a fast enough rate that the capital costs of the MFC are offset by the value of the energy output.Today's MFCs are far from fast enough to be commercially viable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The biggest advantage of an MFC is that it can generate combustion-less, pollution-free bioelectricity directly from the organic matter in biomass, eliminating the intermediate step of generating H2 for a conventional fuel cell.

    “The biggest advantage of an MFC is that it can generate combustion-less, pollution-free bioelectricity directly from the organic matter in biomass.The intermediate step of generating H 2 for a conventional fuel cell is eliminated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The most common approach for converting biomass to H2 is a bacterial fermentation process that is essentially a truncated version of methanogenesis.

    “The most common approach for converting biomass to H 2 is a bacterial fermentation process that is essentially a truncated version of methanogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The cost of methane production is still relatively high compared to the cost of natural gas from fossil-fuel deposits, but this situation should change as natural-gas costs rise and methanogenesis and pre-treatment technologies improve.

    “The cost of methane production is still relatively high compared to the cost of natural gas from fossil-fuel deposits, but this situation should change as natural-gas costs rise and methanogenesis and pre-treatment technologies improve.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Oils extracted from plants and photosynthetic microorganisms have the potential to produce much more significant quantities of biodiesel and are where serious attention must be directed.

    “Oils extracted from plants and photosynthetic microorganisms have the potential to produce much more significant quantities of biodiesel and are where the serious attention must be directed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All approaches that rely on diverting food crops to biofuels will fail to meet the criteria because they compete with food production for high-grade arable land and because their bioenergy output is limited.

    “All approaches that rely on diverting food crops to biofuels will fail to meet the criteria because they compete with food production for high-grade arable land and because their bioenergy output is limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The technology for cellulosic ethanol or bioethanol is not close to being ready.

    “However, the technology is not close to being ready.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The simplest systems for growing photosynthetic microorganisms are large, open ponds or raceways; they keep down capital costs but offer limited control over growth conditions, evaporative water loss, and invasion of non-desired species.

    “The simplest systems for growing photosynthetic microorganisms are large, open ponds or raceways (e.g., Borowitzka, 1999;Christi, 2007;Pulz, 2001).They keep down the capital costs, but offer limited control over the growth conditions, evaporative water loss, and invasion of non-desired species.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Borowitzka, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Christi, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pulz, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Successful bioenergy faces two serious challenges: producing enough biomass-derived fuel to replace a significant fraction of the ~10 TW of energy generated today from fossil fuels, and producing the bioenergy without incurring serious damage to the environment and to the food-supply system.

    “Successful bioenergy faces two serious challenges.The first is producing enough biomass-derived fuel to replace a significant fraction of the $10 TW of energy generated today from fossil fuels.The second challenge is producing the bioenergy without incurring serious damage to the environment and to the food-supply system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Arid and semi-arid regions seem to be the most favorable for locating production facilities for microbial biodiesel, and they can have the added benefit of not taking high-grade arable land out of service.

    “Arid and semi-arid regions seem to be the most favorable, and they can have the added benefit of not taking out of service highgrade arable land.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The non-lipid biomass can be converted to methane, hydrogen, or electricity by the microbial conversion processes.

    “In addition, the non-lipid biomass can be converted to methane, hydrogen, or electricity by the microbial conversion processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Microbial methane production is well established, but can be improved; the other energy outlets (hydrogen and electricity) are very promising but still at the research stage.

    “Microbial methane production is well established, but can be improved.The other energy outlets are very promising, but still at the research stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Microbial methane production is well established.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Enclosed photobioreactor systems can overcome the limitations of open ponds but incur increased capital costs.

    “Enclosed photobioreactor systems (e.g., Borowitzka, 1999;Christi, 2007;Hai et al., 2000;Morita et al., 2001;Pulz, 2001) can overcome the limitations of the open ponds, but incur increased capital costs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Borowitzka, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Christi, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hai et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Fossil-fuel use will decline only when society comes up with renewable, C-neutral alternatives in very large quantity.

    “Fossil-fuel use will decline only when society comes up with renewable, C-neutral alternatives in very large quantity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    One of the best options in the long term is bioenergy, in which the sun's energy is captured as biomass and converted to useful energy forms.

    “One of the best options in the long term is bioenergy, in which the sun's energy is captured as biomass and converted to useful energy forms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Of the many bioenergy options on the table today, most fail on both counts; however, several microorganism-based bioenergy options have the potential to produce renewable energy on a large scale, without disrupting the environment or human activities.

    “Of the many bioenergy options on the table today, most fail on both counts.However, several microorganism-based bioenergy options have the potential to produce renewable energy on a large scale, without disrupting the environment or human activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Society generates biomass residuals from agricultural, animal, and industrial operations, as well as from human wastes; these residuals have large energy value and can replace a significant portion of our use of fossil fuel.

    “Society generates biomass residuals from agricultural, animal, and a variety of industrial operations, as well as from human wastes.These residuals have large energy value and can replace a significant portion of our use of fossil fuel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Even if 50% of the biomass is lipids captured for biodiesel, the other 50% of the biomass should be converted to useful products, most obviously to CH4, H2, or electricity by microbial conversion processes.

    “Even if 50% of the biomass is lipids that are captured for biodiesel, the other 50% of the biomass should be converted to useful products.The most obvious use for the carbohydrate and protein fractions of the microbial biomass is conversion to CH 4 , H 2 , or electricity by the microbial conversion processes described earlier.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Uncontrolled evaporative losses are not allowable, leading to the use of closed photobioreactor systems.

    “Clearly, uncontrolled evaporative losses are not allowable, and this leads to the use of closed photobioreactor systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The only hope for achieving a major slowing and ultimately a reversal in net CO2 accumulation is greatly reducing the combustion of fossil fuels.

    “The only hope for achieving a major slowing and ultimately a reversal in net CO 2 accumulation is greatly reducing the combustion of fossil fuels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    On top of producing biodiesel, photosynthetic microorganisms produce a lot more energy value when they become a major feedstock for the other microbial energy-conversion processes.

    “On top of producing biodiesel, photosynthetic microorganisms produce a lot more energy value when they become a major feedstock for the other microbial energy-conversion processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Growth rates of photosynthetic microorganisms will be higher if a concentrated stream of CO2 is available, so colocation of photobioreactors near a power plant is desirable.

    “While it is possible to obtain CO 2 from the atmosphere, growth rates will be higher if a concentrated stream of CO 2 is available.Therefore, colocation of the photobioreactors near a power plant is desirable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Growth rates of photosynthetic microorganisms will be higher if a concentrated stream of CO2 is available.
55 of 55
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Photosynthetic microorganisms can produce lipids for biodiesel with yields per unit area 100 times or more than possible with any plant system.

    “Under proper conditions, these photosynthetic microorganisms can produce lipids for biodiesel with yields per unit area 100 times or more than possible with any plant system.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land.

    “Photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land, an advantage because our arable land must be used to produce food.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microorganisms can convert almost all of the energy in biomass residuals to methane, hydrogen, and electricity.

    “Microorganisms can convert almost all of the energy in these wastes to methane, hydrogen, and electricity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the maximum reaction, 24 electron equivalents of glucose are routed to 8 electron equivalents in H2 and 16 electron equivalents in acetic acid, so two-thirds of the electrons and energy are misdirected to acetic acid.

    “In this ''maximum'' reaction, the 24 e À eq of C 6 H 12 O 6 are routed to 8 e À eq in H 2 and 16 e À eq in CH 3 COOH.Thus, two-thirds of the electrons and energy are ''misdirected'' to acetic acid.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The most common source of biodiesel today is from waste cooking fats, but the quantity is miniscule compared to society's needs to replace fossil fuel used in transportation.

    “The most common source of biodiesel today is from waste cooking fats.This is an excellent way to capture the resource value of an otherwise waste material, but the quantity is miniscule compared to society's needs to replace fossil fuel used in transportation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Algae accumulate large quantities of lipid as storage materials when under stress and growing slowly, whereas cyanobacteria accumulate lipids in thylakoid membranes associated with high levels of photosynthesis and a rapid growth rate.

    “Algae accumulate large quantities of lipid as storage materials, but they do this when under stress and growing slowly.By contrast, cyanobacteria accumulate lipids in thylakoid membranes, which are associated with high levels of photosynthesis and a rapid growth rate.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land and need not compete with food production.

    “When combined with the fact that photosynthetic microorganisms do not require arable land and need not compete with food production”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Growth rates of photosynthetic microorganisms will be higher if a concentrated stream of CO2 is available.

    “While it is possible to obtain CO 2 from the atmosphere, growth rates will be higher if a concentrated stream of CO 2 is available.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microbial methane production is well established.

    “Microbial methane production is well established, but can be improved.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • MEC hydrogen production is assigned to opposite electrodes

    Minor

    The main text says an MEC generates hydrogen at the cathode, but the Figure 3 caption says the electrical input enables hydrogen production at the anode.

  • Two different annual-energy conversions for one terawatt

    Minor

    The introduction equates 1 TW with 3.2 EJ/year. Later, it equates 4.3 TW with 1.4 × 1017 kJ/year, which implies about 32.6 EJ/year per TW-roughly ten times the earlier conversion.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Carrol J, 2007, Ethanol producers rethink investment
  2. GiampietroM MayumiK.2007.Checking the quality of primary energy sources: Why we believe that the idea of large‐scale production of biofuels from agricultural land is a hoax. Proc. 9th Biennial Conf. Intl. Society of Ecol. Econ. 16–18 December 2006 New Delhi India.
  3. Gilman D, 2007, Fueling organ with sustainable biofuels
  4. Hall DO, 1998, Biomass resources other than wood
  5. RittmannBE TorresCI Kato MarcusA.2008.Perspectives on microbial fuel cells and other biomass‐based renewable energy technologies. Emerging Technologies V. Shah ed. Springer in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rittmann, B. E.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rittmann, Bruce E.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-22
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
203-212
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2119200038
Cited by
651
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 49
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Science Foundation Arizona
  • Arizona State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
anaerobic digestion, methane production, hydrogen production, microbial fuel cells, photosynthetic microorganisms, algae, cyanobacteria, biodiesel, lipid production, arable land use, food supply, fossil fuel substitution, climate change mitigation
MeSH terms
Bioelectric Energy Sources, Conservation of Energy Resources, Electricity, Electric Power Supplies, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review