Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 519

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project

The ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 investigators, Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Bernert, S., Bruffaerts, R., Brugha, T. S., Bryson, H., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Demyttenaere, K., Gasquet, I., Haro, J. M., Katz, S. J., Kessler, R. C., Kovess, V., Lépine, J. P., Ormel, J., Polidori, G., Russo, L. J., Vilagut, G., Almansa, J., Arbabzadeh‐Bouchez, S., Autonell, J., Bernal, M., Buist‐Bouwman, M. A., Codony, M., Domingo‐Salvany, A., Ferrer, M., Joo, S. S., Martínez‐Alonso, M., Matschinger, H., Mazzi, F., Morgan, Z., Morosini, P., Palacín, C., Romera, B., Taub, N., Vollebergh, W. A. M.·2004·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: Comprehensive information about access and patterns of use of mental health services in Europe is lacking. We present the first results of the use of health services for mental disorders in six European countries as part of the ESEMeD project. Method: The study was conducted in: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. Individuals aged 18 years and over who were not institutionalized were eligible for an computer‐assisted interview done at home. The 21 425 participants were asked to report how frequently they consulted formal health services due to their emotions or mental health, the type of professional they consulted and the treatment they received as a result of their consultation in the previous year. Results: An average of 6.4% of the total sample had consulted formal health services in the previous 12 months. Of the participants with a 12‐month mental disorder, 25.7% had consulted a formal health service during that period. This proportion was higher for individuals with a mood disorder (36.5%, 95% CI 32.5–40.5) than for those with anxiety disorders (26.1%, 95% CI 23.1–29.1). Among individuals with a 12‐month mental disorder who had contacted the health services 12 months previously, approximately two‐thirds had contacted a mental health professional. Among those with a 12‐month mental disorder consulting formal health services, 21.2% received no treatment. Conclusion: The ESEMeD results suggest that the use of health services is limited among individuals with mental disorders in the European countries studied. The factors associated with this limited access and their implications deserve further research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00330.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. World Health Organization (WHO)., 2000, The World Health Report 2000 Health Systems: improving performance.
  2. Katz SJ, 1997, The use of outpatient mental health services in the United States and Ontario: the impact of mental morbidity and perceived need for care, Am J Public Health, 87, 1136, 10.2105/AJPH.87.7.1136 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1017/S0033291799002974 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820140007001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00022.x · DOI
  6. 10.1097/00004850-199701000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Katz SJ, 1997, Mental health care use, morbidity, and socioeconomic status in the United States and Ontario, Inquiry, 34, 38
  8. 10.1176/ajp.155.10.1415 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/070674379704200903 · DOI
  10. 10.1001/archpsyc.57.4.383 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2105/AJPH.90.4.602 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/mpr.123 · DOI
  13. ESEMed/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators, 2004, Sampling and methods of the European study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project, Acta Psychiatr Scand, 109
  14. SAS Institute Inc., 1999, SAS® software
  15. Shah BV, 1997, SUDAAN user's manual
  16. 10.1017/CBO9780511543562 · DOI
  17. 10.1001/archpsyc.55.2.109 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 519

Metadata

Authors
The ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 investigators, Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Bernert, S., Bruffaerts, R., Brugha, T. S., Bryson, H., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Demyttenaere, K., Gasquet, I., Haro, J. M., Katz, S. J., Kessler, R. C., Kovess, V., Lépine, J. P., Ormel, J., Polidori, G., Russo, L. J., Vilagut, G., Almansa, J., Arbabzadeh‐Bouchez, S., Autonell, J., Bernal, M., Buist‐Bouwman, M. A., Codony, M., Domingo‐Salvany, A., Ferrer, M., Joo, S. S., Martínez‐Alonso, M., Matschinger, H., Mazzi, F., Morgan, Z., Morosini, P., Palacín, C., Romera, B., Taub, N., & Vollebergh, W. A. M.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
109
Issue
s420
Pages
47-54
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2056863568
Cited by
519
References
5
FWCI
29.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00330.x
The paper
The ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 investigators, Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Bernert, S., Bruffaerts, R., Brugha, T. S., Bryson, H., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Demyttenaere, K., Gasquet, I., Haro, J. M., Katz, S. J., Kessler, R. C., Kovess, V., Lépine, J. P., Ormel, J., Polidori, G., Russo, L. J., . . . Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2004). Use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00330.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.