Cited by 20Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNuclear Receptors and SignalingCoenzyme Q10 studies and effects

Treatment of Parkinson's disease with NADH

Dizdar, N., Kågedal, B., Lindvall, B.·2009·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

It has earlier been claimed that clinical improvement of patients with Parkinson's disease is obtained by treatment with NADH. This has to be verified by double-blind, clinical studies and measurement of biochemical effects of the treatment. In a double blind study five patients with clinically moderate Parkinson's disease were treated with NADH, 25 mg, given intravenously once a day for four days. Then they were given 25 mg NADH intramuscularly after 2 and 4 weeks. Disability scores were determined before each treatment and two weeks after the final injection. A control group (n = 4) with the same degree of Parkinson's disease obtained sodium chloride with the same schedule. According to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale a tendency to clinical improvement was seen after the iv infusions in both treatment and placebo groups. However, the changes were not statistically significant, and no changes occurred during the following weeks. No changes were found neither in the study nor the control group regarding cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of dynorfin, metenkefalin, somatostatin, hydroxy-methoxy-phenylglycol, homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid. The results indicate that no great changes are obtained after short-term treatment of parkinsonian patients with NADH, neither clinically nor biochemically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02735.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A double-blinded study of 5 clinically moderate PD patients found no benefit from NADH given intravenously at 25 mg once daily for 4 days and then intramuscularly after 2 and 4 weeks.

    “benefits were not seen in a double-blinded study on 5 clinically moderate PD patients treated with NADH (25 mg) given intravenously once a day for 4 days followed by NADH (25 mg) given intramuscularly after 2 and 4 weeks”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Dizdar et al., 1994

  • The Dizdar et al. PD study was double-blinded.

    “double-blinded study on 5 clinically moderate PD patients”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Dizdar et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dizdar, N., Kågedal, B., & Lindvall, B.
Affiliations
Linköping University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Dizdar, N.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Published
2009-01-29
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
345-347
ISSN
  • 0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0404
OpenAlex
W2028246911
Cited by
20
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, NADH, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, disability score, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, dynorphin, met-enkephalin, somatostatin, homovanillic acid, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, short-term treatment
MeSH terms
Disability Evaluation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Injections, Intramuscular, NAD, Neurologic Examination, Parkinson Disease, Pilot Projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review