Cited by 65Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Expectancy, covert sensitization and imaginal desensitization in compulsive sexuality

McConaghy, N., Armstrong, M. S., Blaszczynski, A.·1985·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Twenty subjects were randomly allocated to receive either imaginal desensitization (ID) or covert sensitization (CS) to reduce compulsive anomalous sexual behaviours. It was predicted from a behavioural completion model of compulsive urges, that patients' response to ID would be at least as good as their response to CS and would correlate with reduction in their general levels of tension following treatment. These predictions were supported. Correlations between patients' expectancies of treatment success and their response were of moderate strength for expectancy measures taken following the first session of both treatments, but much stronger for expectancy measures following the last session of ID. It was suggested that patients experienced a specific response during the further sessions of ID, which enabled them to improve their prediction of response. As aversive therapies remain the standard behavioural therapy for sexual paraphilias, the finding of the present study that imaginal desensitization without traumatic imagery or aversive physical stimuli is at least as effective would seem to require urgent replication, if only on ethical grounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02592.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • McConaghy 1988 was assessed as having a high risk of bias because no attempt was made to blind outcome assessors.

    “We also assessed the remaining study, McConaghy 1988, as having a high risk of bias (in contrast to previous work by the same authors, McConaghy 1985) because no attempt was made to blind outcome assessors.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McConaghy, N., Armstrong, M. S., & Blaszczynski, A.
Affiliations
Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
McConaghy, N.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-08
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
176-187
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2000598063
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
paraphilias, covert sensitization, expectancy, treatment expectancy, aversive therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Compulsive Behavior, Desensitization, Psychologic, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Paraphilic Disorders, Prognosis, Set, Psychology, Sex Offenses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review