CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39Schizophrenia research and treatmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Personality and psychosis: use of the Standardized Assessment of Personality

Cutting, J., Cowen, P. J., Mann, A. H., Jenkins, R.·1986·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02672.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Standardized Assessment of Personality, a semistructured interview for use with an informant, was used with a relative or a close friend to determine the premorbid personality of 100 consecutive patients admitted with major psychiatric disorders – major affective disorders (18 manics, 35 depressives), schizophrenia (28) and other functional psychoses (19). Forty‐four per cent of the entire sample had an abnormal personality as defined by the presence of one of 10 prominent traits to a marked degree. A further 6% had the same traits to a lesser degree. The proportion of patients with an abnormal personality (all types) was comparable across the four diagnostic groups (manics 39%, depressives 54%, schizophrenics 39%, other functional psychotics 37%). However, if one included all traits (marked and mild), patients with an affective disorder had more between them than did the non‐affective groups. This difference was largely accounted for by cyclothymic, anxious and obsessional traits. The schizophrenics and other functional psychotics had surprisingly few prominent traits and, in particular, a schizoid personality rarely preceded a schizophrenic illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02672.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personality disorder is much more prevalent in secondary care settings than in the community.

    “it is, as would be expected, much higher in secondary care settings”

    From Personality disorder: a new global perspective (2010) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Cutting, J., Cowen, P. J., Mann, A. H., & Jenkins, R.
Corresponding author
Cutting, J.
ORCID
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
87-92
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02672.x
OpenAlex
W2005125472
Cited by
39
References
17
Citations by year
2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 7904 d)
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
premorbid personality, personality traits, psychosis, schizophrenia, mood disorders, bipolar disorder, functional psychoses, informant interview, schizoid personality disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Cyclothymic Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Psychotic Disorders, Schizoid Personality Disorder, Schizophrenic Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review