Cited by 76Human-Animal Interaction StudiesCardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Survival following an acute coronary syndrome: a pet theory put to the test

Parker, G. B., Gayed, A., Owen, C. A., Hyett, M. P., Hilton, T. M., Heruc, G. A.·2010·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to revisit findings from previous studies reporting that pet ownership improves outcome following an admission for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method: Four hundred and twenty‐four patients admitted to a cardiac unit with an ACS completed questions regarding pet ownership in hospital. Rates of cardiac death and readmission were assessed 1 year following hospitalization. Results: Pet owners were more likely to experience a death or readmission following their hospitalization, after controlling for key psychosocial and medical covariates. When dog and cat owners were considered separately, cat ownership was significantly associated with increased risk of death or readmission. Conclusion: In this independent study, pet ownership at baseline, and cat ownership in particular, was associated with increased cardiac morbidity and mortality in the year following an admission for an acute coronary syndrome, a finding contrary to previous reports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01410.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pet ownership was associated with a higher incidence of heart attacks and readmissions in heart attack patients instead of a lower incidence.

    “Other studies found for example that pet ownership was associated with a higher incidence of heart attacks and readmissions in heart attack patients instead of a lower incidence [110]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, G. B., Gayed, A., Owen, C. A., Hyett, M. P., Hilton, T. M., & Heruc, G. A.
Affiliations
Black Dog Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Parker, G. B.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-14
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
65-70
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W1682328562
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
pet ownership, acute coronary syndrome, cat ownership, dog ownership, cardiac mortality, hospital readmission, cardiac morbidity, psychosocial factors, human-animal bond
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina, Unstable, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Human-Animal Bond, Cats, Death, Dogs, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Ownership, Patient Readmission, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Analysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review