Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiplex cytokine profiling in patients with sepsis

MERA, SIMONA, TATULESCU, DOINA, CISMARU, CRISTINA, BONDOR, COSMINA, SLAVCOVICI, ADRIANA, ZANC, VIRGINIA, CARSTINA, DUMITRU, OLTEAN, MIHAI·2011·APMIS

Abstract

Mera S, Tatulescu D, Cismaru C, Bondor C, Slavcovici A, Zanc V, Carstina D, Oltean M. Multiplex cytokine profiling in patients with sepsis. APMIS 2010; 119: 155–63. A major goal for the clinical research in sepsis is mapping the various mediators driving the systemic manifestations of infection. Identifying relevant mediators responsible for the physiological alterations during sepsis may offer diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities. We aimed to explore the novel approach of simultaneously measuring several biomolecules using the multiplex technique and to study its relevance in diagnosing and monitoring septic patients. In 30 patients fulfilling American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine sepsis criteria, we simultaneously measured 17 cytokines during the first 7 days after admission. We analysed the results with respect to the presence of septic shock and survival. Five patients died during the study. We found a significant positive correlation between the monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)‐1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)‐1β and interleukin (IL)‐8 levels in the first 3 days and Sepsis‐related Organ Failure Assessment score on day 1. Most cytokines showed no significant difference between patients with mild or severe sepsis. The initial levels of MIP‐1β and granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor were lower in patients with septic shock than in patients without shock. IL‐8 and MCP‐1 early after admission were higher in the non‐survivors (p < 0.05). In the multivariate logistical regression, the initial levels of IL‐8 were the most predictive for fatal outcome. Moreover, IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐12, interferon‐γ, granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and tumour necrosis factor‐α exhibited persistent increases in non‐survivors. The simultaneous evaluation of multiple cytokines in sepsis may identify complex cytokine patterns that reflect the systemic response associated with shock and mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02705.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
MERA, S., TATULESCU, D., CISMARU, C., BONDOR, C., SLAVCOVICI, A., ZANC, V., CARSTINA, D., & OLTEAN, M.
Venue
APMIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-10
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
155-163
ISSN
  • 0903-4641 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0463
OpenAlex
W1545718209
Cited by
231
References
1
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplex cytokine profiling in patients with sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02705.x
The paper
MERA, S., TATULESCU, D., CISMARU, C., BONDOR, C., SLAVCOVICI, A., ZANC, V., CARSTINA, D., & OLTEAN, M. (2011). Multiplex cytokine profiling in patients with sepsis. APMIS. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02705.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.