Cited by 193Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysAcute Kidney Injury Research

The clinical importance of a cytokine network in the acute phase of sepsis

Open access
Matsumoto, Hisatake, Ogura, Hiroshi, Shimizu, Kentaro, Ikeda, Mitsunori, Hirose, Tomoya, Matsuura, Hiroshi, Kang, Sujin, Takahashi, Kanae +2 more·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Sepsis remains a major cause of death. Cytokines interact closely with each other and play a crucial role in the progression of sepsis. We focussed on the associations of a cytokine network with prognosis and disease severities in sepsis. This retrospective study included 31 patients with sepsis and 13 healthy controls. Blood samples were collected from patients on days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 11 and 15 and from healthy controls. Levels of PAI-1, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12/IL-23p40, IL-17A, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-4 and IL-10 were measured. SOFA, JAAM DIC and ISTH DIC scores were evaluated at the same times blood samples were taken. Network analysis revealed a network formed by PAI-1, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1 and IL-10 on days 1, 2 and 4 throughout the acute phase of sepsis. There were positive correlations of each cytokine and the combined score (IL-6 + IL-8 + IL-10 + MCP-1) with the SOFA, JAAM DIC and ISTH DIC scores throughout the acute phase. A Cox proportional hazards model focussed on the acute phase showed that the above combined score was significantly related with patient prognosis, suggesting that the cytokine network of IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1 and IL-10 could play a pivotal role in the acute phase of sepsis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-32275-8

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In septic shock, underlying dysregulated immune responses produce cytokines in response to infection.

    “In septic shock, underlying dysregulated immune responses produce cytokines in response to infection [23].”

    From Non-Diabetic Hypoglycemia: Evaluation and Management in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes pathogen-associated signals activating immune cells in sepsis and an inflammatory response driven by cytokines. The Discussion (page unavailable) also says activated immune cells produce cytokines. These passages support the proposed mechanism in sepsis, but do not establish it specifically for septic shock. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This systemic overdrive accelerates glucose utilization that may outpace the body's gluconeogenic capacity.

    “This systemic overdrive accelerates glucose utilization that eventually may outpace the body's gluconeogenic capacity.”

    From Non-Diabetic Hypoglycemia: Evaluation and Management in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction and Discussion describe a systemic inflammatory response and a cytokine network in sepsis, but do not address glucose utilization or gluconeogenic capacity. Searches for those terms and for glucose metabolism and hypoglycemia found no passage in our copy supporting the claimed metabolic effect; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsumoto, H., Ogura, H., Shimizu, K., Ikeda, M., Hirose, T., Matsuura, H., Kang, S., Takahashi, K., Tanaka, T., & Shimazu, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Osaka City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Matsumoto, Hisatake
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-09-18
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
13995-13995
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891533504
Cited by
193
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14
FWCI
14.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
A Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology in Japan.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
sepsis, cytokine network, prognostic factors, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, MCP-1, IL-10, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, SOFA score, disseminated intravascular coagulation, disease severity, network analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Survival Rate, Case-Control Studies, Cytokines, Disease Progression, Sepsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review