Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In the beginning: Marhashi and the origins of Magan’s ceramic industry in the third millennium BC

Potts, D.T.·2005·Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy

Abstract

Ceramics from the Jiroft plain in southeastern Iran are compared with material of Umm an‐Nar‐type dating to the mid‐ and late third millennium BC in the Oman Peninsula. Technological and stylistic comparisons suggest the strong possibility that potters from the Iranian side of the Straits of Hormuz may have been the instigators of Magan's earliest ceramic industry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0471.2005.00042.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early locally-produced pottery in southeastern Arabia appears to be influenced by ceramic technologies from the Indo-Iranian borderlands.

    “Early locally-produced pottery in southeastern Arabia appears to be influenced by ceramic technologies from the Indo-Iranian borderlands [15–20].”
  • Pottery technology in southeastern Arabia was adopted at a relatively fast pace during the early-mid third millennium BC, within the context of other pyrotechnologies, such as metalworking, as well as the movement of imported pottery and possibly craftspeople from the Indo-Iranian region and Mesopotamia.

    “Pottery technology in southeastern Arabia was adopted at a relatively fast pace during the early-mid third millennium BC, within the context of other pyrotechnologies, such as metalworking, as well as the movement of imported pottery and possibly craftspeople from the Indo-Iranian region and Mesopotamia [16–20,150].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Lawler A., 2004, Rocking the cradle, Smithsonian, 35, 40
  2. Majidzadeh Y., 2003, Jiroft: The earliest Oriental civilization
  3. Lamberg‐Karlovsky CC., 1988, The ‘Intercultural Style’ carved vessels, IrAnt, 23, 45
  4. 10.1086/202136 · DOI
  5. Pittman H., 1984, Art of the Bronze Age: Southeastern Iran, Western Central Asia and the Indus Valley
  6. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1979.tb00249.x · DOI
  7. 10.1515/zava.1982.72.2.237 · DOI
  8. Klengel E, 1980, Zum Fragment eines Steatitgefäßes mit einer Inschrift des Rimuš von Akkad, Rocznik Orientalistyczny, 41, 45
  9. Gadd CJ., 1928, Ur Excavations Texts, 3
  10. Cf.SteinkellerP.Contacts between Babylonia Makkan and southeastern Iran (Marhashi) during the second half of the third millennium BC. In press. My thanks to Prof. Steinkeller for providing me with a copy of this paper prior to its publication.
  11. Burkholder G., 1971, Steatite carvings from Saudi Arabia, Artibus Asiae, 33, 306
  12. Al‐Tikriti WY., 1981, Reconsideration of the late fourth and third millennium B.C. in the Arabian Gulf with special reference to the United Arab Emirates
  13. Ziolkowski MC., 2001, The soft‐stone vessels from Sharm, Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, AAE, 12
  14. Crawford H, 1996, A ‘hut pot’ in the National Museum, Bahrain, AAE, 7, 140
  15. Lombard P, 1999, Bahrain, the civilisation of the two seas: From Dilmun to Tylos
  16. Thorvildsen K., 1963, Burial cairns on Umm‐en Nar, Kuml, 1962, 219
  17. Biagi P., 1987, The prehistoric fishermen settlements of RH5 and RH6 at Qurum, Sultanate of Oman, PSAS, 17, 7
  18. Copeland L, 1976, Flint artifacts from the Buraimi area, Eastern Arabia, and their relations with the Near Eastern post‐Palaeolithic, PSAS, 6, 40
  19. Uerpmann M., 1989, Oman Studies: Papers on the archaeology and history of Oman, 169
  20. Popescu ES., 2003, Archaeology of the United Arab Emirates: Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Archaeology of the U.A.E, 46
  21. Uerpmann M, 2000, Stone Age nomadism in SE Arabia—Palaeo‐economic considerations on the Neolithic site of Al‐Buhais 18 in the Emirate of Sharjah, UAE, PSAS, 30, 229
  22. Uerpmann M, 2000, Archaeozoology of the Near East IVB, 40
  23. Apud Kapel H., 1967, Atlas of the Stone Age cultures of Qatar, 18
  24. Biagi P., 1994, An early Palaeolithic site near Saiwan (Sultanate of Oman), AAE, 5, 81
  25. Oates J., 2004, From handaxe to Khan: Essays presented to Peder Mortensen on the occasion of his 70th birthday, 87
  26. Uerpmann M, 1996, ‘Ubaid pottery in the eastern Gulf—new evidence from Umm al‐Qaiwain (U.A.E.), AAE, 7, 125
  27. 10.1017/S0003598X00047463 · DOI
  28. 10.1017/S0003598X00070599 · DOI
  29. Potts DT., 1990, The Arabian Gulf in Antiquity, i, 69
  30. Potts DT., 1986, Ǧamdat Na r: Period or regional style?, 121
  31. Méry S., 2000, Les céramiques d'Oman et l'Asie moyenne: Une archéologie des échanges à l’Âge du Bronze, 169
  32. Frifelt K., The island of Umm an‐Nar, vol. 1. Third millennium graves
  33. Benton JN., 1996, Excavations at Al Sufouh: A third millennium site in the Emirate of Dubai, 88
  34. Caldwell JR, 1967, Investigations at Tal‐i‐Iblis, 111ff
  35. Potts DT., Tepe Yahya, Tell Abraq and the chronology of the Bampur sequence, IrAnt, 2003, 1
  36. Potts DT., 2003, Ancient Near Eastern culture through objects: Festschrift for P.R.S. Moorey, 77

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Potts, D. T.
Venue
Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-25
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
67-78
ISSN
  • 0905-7196
  • 1600-0471
Cited by
19
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review