The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast‐like cells
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of differently cross‐linked collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast‐like cells. Four collagen membranes [BioGide® (BG), BioMend® (BM), Ossix® (OS) and TutoDent® (TD)] were tested. Cells plated on culture dishes (CD) served as positive controls. Six specimens of each membrane were incubated with (1) human PDL fibroblasts [2 × 10 4 cells] (n=24), and (2) human osteoblast‐like cells (SaOs‐2) [2 × 10 4 cells] (n=24) under standardized conditions. After 7 days, adherent cells were stained with hematoxylin and counted using a reflected light microscope and the cell density per square millimeter was calculated. Additionally, cell morphology was investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cell counts were presented as means and standard deviations (cells/mm 2) and analyzed for statistical difference using the Wilcoxon test: (1) CD (434±76)>BG (64±19)=OS (61±8)>TD (44±4)>BM (12±5); (2) CD (453±92)>BG (94±46)=TD (84±49)>OS (41±23)>BM (0). SEM examination revealed that PDL fibroblasts adherent on BG, TD and OS appeared spindle‐shaped and flat, like cells on CD. SaOs‐2 osteoblasts adherent on CD were star shaped and flat, but mostly round in shape on BG, OS and TD. BM appeared to be incompatible with the attachment and proliferation of SaOs‐2 cells; however, a few PDL fibroblasts were found in a round shape. Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that (i) BG, TD and OS promoted, and (ii) BM inhibited the attachment and proliferation of human PDL fibroblasts and human SaOs‐2 osteoblasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of cell shape in growth control
Folkman, J., & Moscona, A. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/273345a0 · Cited by 2,422
Cited by
Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited
Elgali, I., Omar, O., Dahlin, C., & Thomsen, P. (2017) · European Journal of Oral Sciences · doi:10.1111/eos.12364 · Cited by 848
Mechanisms of Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review
Liu, J., & Kerns, D. G. (2014) · The Open Dentistry Journal · doi:10.2174/1874210601408010056 · Cited by 425
Biodegradation of differently cross‐linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat
Rothamel, D., Schwarz, F., Sager, M., Herten, M., Sculean, A., & Becker, J. (2005) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x · Cited by 408
Self-citationDimitriou, R., Mataliotakis, G. I., Calori, G. M., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2012) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-81 · Cited by 398
Collagen—emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient
Abou Neel, E. A., Bozec, L., Knowles, J. C., Syed, O., Mudera, V., Day, R., & Hyun, J. K. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.010 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothamel, D., Schwarz, F., Sculean, A., Herten, M., Scherbaum, W., & Becker, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-449
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W2042550135
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast‐like cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01039.x
- The paper
- Rothamel, D., Schwarz, F., Sculean, A., Herten, M., Scherbaum, W., & Becker, J. (2004). Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast‐like cells. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01039.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
