The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years: III. Conventional FPDs
Abstract
Abstract: The present study was done to determine the long‐term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow‐up visits were included in the meta‐analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to in situ and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10‐year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81–93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7–85.2%). The 10‐year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10‐year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
E. Jung, R., Zembic, A., Pjetursson, B. E., Zwahlen, M., & S. Thoma, D. (2012) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationSailer, I., Gottnerb, J., Känel, S., & Hämmerle, C. H.-F. (2009) · PubMed · doi:10.5167/uzh-25315 · Cited by 314
Relationship between sponsorship and failure rate of dental implants: a systematic approach
Popelut, A., Valet, F., Fromentin, O., Thomas, A., & Bouchard, P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010274 · Cited by 86
Oral Rehabilitation Considerations for Partially Edentulous Periodontal Patients
Dhingra, K. (2012) · Journal of Prosthodontics · doi:10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00864.x · Cited by 55
Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: A three-year follow up
Boeckler, A. F., Lee, H., Stadler, A., & Setz, J. M. (2009) · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(09)60176-1 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, K., Pjetursson, B. E., Lang, N. P., & Chan, E. S. Y.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 654-666
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W2148317989
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years: III. Conventional FPDs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x
- The paper
- Tan, K., Pjetursson, B. E., Lang, N. P., & Chan, E. S. Y. (2004). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years: III. Conventional FPDs. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.