Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review: Socket preservation following extraction

Ten Heggeler, J. M. A. G., Slot, D. E., Van der Weijden, G. A.·2011·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess, based on the existing literature, the benefit of socket preservation therapies in patients with a tooth extraction in the anterior or premolar region as compared with no additional treatment with respect to bone level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE-PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) were searched till June 2010 for appropriate studies, which reported data concerning the dimensional changes in alveolar height and width after tooth extraction with or without additional treatment like bonefillers, collagen, growth factors or membranes. RESULTS: Independent screening of the titles and abstracts of 1918 MEDLINE-PubMed and 163 Cochrane papers resulted in nine publications that met the eligibility criteria. In natural healing after extraction, a reduction in width ranging between 2.6 and 4.6 mm and in height between 0.4 and 3.9 mm was observed. With respect to socket preservation, the freeze-dried bone allograft group performed best with a gain in height, however, concurrent with a loss in width of 1.2 mm. CONCLUSION: Data concerning socket preservation therapies in humans are scarce, which does not allow any firm conclusions. Socket preservation may aid in reducing the bone dimensional changes following tooth extraction. However, they do not prevent bone resorption because, depending on the technique, on the basis of the included papers one may still expect a loss in width and in height.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Ten Heggeler, J. M. A. G., Slot, D. E., & Van der Weijden, G. A.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-22
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
779-788
ISSN
0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132244394
Cited by
342
References
20
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review: Socket preservation following extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x
The paper
Ten Heggeler, J. M. A. G., Slot, D. E., & Van der Weijden, G. A. (2011). Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review: Socket preservation following extraction. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.