The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review: Socket preservation following extraction
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess, based on the existing literature, the benefit of socket preservation therapies in patients with a tooth extraction in the anterior or premolar region as compared with no additional treatment with respect to bone level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE-PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) were searched till June 2010 for appropriate studies, which reported data concerning the dimensional changes in alveolar height and width after tooth extraction with or without additional treatment like bonefillers, collagen, growth factors or membranes. RESULTS: Independent screening of the titles and abstracts of 1918 MEDLINE-PubMed and 163 Cochrane papers resulted in nine publications that met the eligibility criteria. In natural healing after extraction, a reduction in width ranging between 2.6 and 4.6 mm and in height between 0.4 and 3.9 mm was observed. With respect to socket preservation, the freeze-dried bone allograft group performed best with a gain in height, however, concurrent with a loss in width of 1.2 mm. CONCLUSION: Data concerning socket preservation therapies in humans are scarce, which does not allow any firm conclusions. Socket preservation may aid in reducing the bone dimensional changes following tooth extraction. However, they do not prevent bone resorption because, depending on the technique, on the basis of the included papers one may still expect a loss in width and in height.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x · Cited by 21,320
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group* (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 · Cited by 3,824
Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog
Araújo, M. G., & Lindhe, J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2005.00642.x · Cited by 1,954
Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post‐extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review
Van der Weijden, F., Dell'Acqua, F., & Slot, D. E. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009.01482.x · Cited by 856
Self-citationNew attachment formation in the human periodontium by guided tissue regeneration Case reports
Gottlow, J., Nyman, S., Lindhe, J., Karring, T., & Wennström, J. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00854.x · Cited by 828
Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites: An experimental study in dogs
Cardaropoli, G., Araújo, M., & Lindhe, J. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x · Cited by 760
Iasella, J. M., Greenwell, H., Miller, R. L., Hill, M., Drisko, C., Bohra, A. A., & Scheetz, J. P. (2003) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990 · Cited by 756
Preservation of Alveolar Bone in Extraction Sockets Using Bioabsorbable Membranes
Lekovic, V., Camargo, P. M., Klokkevold, P. R., Weinlaender, M., Kenney, E. B., Dimitrijevic, B., & Nedic, M. (1998) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1044 · Cited by 573
Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials
Pildal, J., Hrobjartsson, A., Jorgensen, K., Hilden, J., Altman, D., & Gotzsche, P. (2007) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dym087 · Cited by 472
Cited by
Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration
Benic, G. I., & Hämmerle, C. H. F. (2014) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12039 · Cited by 511
Avila‐Ortiz, G., Chambrone, L., & Vignoletti, F. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13057 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Ten Heggeler, J. M. A. G., Slot, D. E., & Van der Weijden, G. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-22
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 779-788
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132244394
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review: Socket preservation following extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x
- The paper
- Ten Heggeler, J. M. A. G., Slot, D. E., & Van der Weijden, G. A. (2011). Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review: Socket preservation following extraction. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.