The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5‐ and 10‐year survival of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications. Methods: An electronic M edline search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case series on FDP s with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years. Patients had to have been examined clinically at the follow‐up visit. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using standard and random‐effects P oisson regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5‐year and 10‐year survival and complication rates. Results: The updated search provided 979 titles and 257 abstracts. Full‐text analysis was performed for 90 articles resulting in a total 32 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis of these studies indicated an estimated survival of implants supporting FDP s of 95.6% after 5 years and 93.1% after 10 years. When machined surface implants were excluded from the analysis and only rough surface implants included, the survival rate increased to 97.2% after 5 years. The survival rate of implant‐supported FDP s was 95.4% after 5 years and 80.1% after 10 years of function. When the analysis was done exclusively for metal–ceramic FDP s, hence the old gold–acrylic FDP s were excluded, the survival rate increased significantly. The survival rate of metal–ceramic implant‐supported FDP s was 96.4% after 5 years and 93.9% after 10 years. Only 66.4% of the patients were free of any complications after 5 years. The most frequent complications over the 5‐year observation period were fractures of the veneering material (13.5%), peri‐implantitis and soft tissue complications (8.5%), loss of access hole restoration (5.4%), abutment or screw loosening (5.3%), and loss of retention of cemented FDP s (4.7%). Conclusion: It may be concluded that implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) are a safe and predictable treatment method with high survival rates. However, biological and technical complications were frequent (33.6%). To minimize the incidence of complications, dental professionals should make great effort in choosing reliable components and materials for implant‐supported FDP s and the patients should be placed in well‐structured maintenance system after treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kirkwood, B. R., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2014) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 2,820
Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Altman, D. G. (2000) · Cited by 2,312
Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐Analysis in Context
(2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470693926 · Cited by 1,693
Buser, D., Mericske‐stern, R., Pierre Bernard, J. P., Behneke, A., Behneke, N., Hirt, H. P., Belser, U. C., & Lang, N. P. (1997) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x · Cited by 1,286
Berglundh, T., Persson, L., & Klinge, B. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.12.x · Cited by 1,086
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224 · Cited by 756
Pjetursson, B. E., Tan, K., Lang, N. P., Brägger, U., Egger, M., & Zwahlen, M. (2004) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x · Cited by 486
Self-citationLong‐term implant survival and success: a 10–16‐year follow‐up of non‐submerged dental implants
Simonis, P., Dufour, T., & Tenenbaum, H. (2010) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01912.x · Cited by 457
Brägger, U., Aeschlimann, S., Bürgin, W., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Lang, N. P. (2001) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x · Cited by 395
Jemt, T., Lekholm, U., & Adell, R. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 389
Cited by
Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis
Howe, M.-S., Keys, W., & Richards, D. (2019) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008 · Cited by 555
The etiology of hard‐ and soft‐tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review
Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Tarnow, D. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.16-0810 · Cited by 164
Relevance of Biofilm Models in Periodontal Research: From Static to Dynamic Systems
Sánchez, M. C., Alonso-Español, A., Ribeiro-Vidal, H., Alonso, B., Herrera, D., & Sanz, M. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9020428 · Cited by 39
Custom-made additively manufactured subperiosteal implant
STRAPPA, E. M., MEMÈ, L., CEREA, M., ROY, M., & BAMBINI, F. (2023) · Minerva Dental and Oral Science · doi:10.23736/s2724-6329.22.04640-x · Cited by 32
Inhibition of initial bacterial adhesion on titanium surfaces by lactoferrin coating
Nagano-Takebe, F., Miyakawa, H., Nakazawa, F., & Endo, K. (2014) · Biointerphases · doi:10.1116/1.4867415 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Pjetursson, B. E., Thoma, D., Jung, R., Zwahlen, M., & Zembic, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- s6
- Pages
- 22-38
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W2147112206
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x
- The paper
- Pjetursson, B. E., Thoma, D., Jung, R., Zwahlen, M., & Zembic, A. (2012). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.