Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 915

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years

Pjetursson, Bjarni E., Thoma, Daniel, Jung, Ronald, Zwahlen, Marcel, Zembic, Anja·2012·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5‐ and 10‐year survival of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications. Methods: An electronic M edline search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case series on FDP s with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years. Patients had to have been examined clinically at the follow‐up visit. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using standard and random‐effects P oisson regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5‐year and 10‐year survival and complication rates. Results: The updated search provided 979 titles and 257 abstracts. Full‐text analysis was performed for 90 articles resulting in a total 32 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis of these studies indicated an estimated survival of implants supporting FDP s of 95.6% after 5 years and 93.1% after 10 years. When machined surface implants were excluded from the analysis and only rough surface implants included, the survival rate increased to 97.2% after 5 years. The survival rate of implant‐supported FDP s was 95.4% after 5 years and 80.1% after 10 years of function. When the analysis was done exclusively for metal–ceramic FDP s, hence the old gold–acrylic FDP s were excluded, the survival rate increased significantly. The survival rate of metal–ceramic implant‐supported FDP s was 96.4% after 5 years and 93.9% after 10 years. Only 66.4% of the patients were free of any complications after 5 years. The most frequent complications over the 5‐year observation period were fractures of the veneering material (13.5%), peri‐implantitis and soft tissue complications (8.5%), loss of access hole restoration (5.4%), abutment or screw loosening (5.3%), and loss of retention of cemented FDP s (4.7%). Conclusion: It may be concluded that implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) are a safe and predictable treatment method with high survival rates. However, biological and technical complications were frequent (33.6%). To minimize the incidence of complications, dental professionals should make great effort in choosing reliable components and materials for implant‐supported FDP s and the patients should be placed in well‐structured maintenance system after treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 915

Metadata

Authors
Pjetursson, B. E., Thoma, D., Jung, R., Zwahlen, M., & Zembic, A.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10
Volume
23
Issue
s6
Pages
22-38
ISSN
  • 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0501
OpenAlex
W2147112206
Cited by
915
References
45
FWCI
9.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x
The paper
Pjetursson, B. E., Thoma, D., Jung, R., Zwahlen, M., & Zembic, A. (2012). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.