Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Progression of periodontal disease in adult subjects in the absence of periodontal therapy

Lindhe, J., Haffaiee, A. D., Socransky, S. S.·1983·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Abstract Progression of periodontal disease in adult subjects in the absence of periodontal therapy was monitored in 2 populations. One group of 64 Swedish subjects (mean age 40.5 years at entry) with mild to moderate periodontal attachment loss was monitored for attachment level changes at baseline, 3 and 6 years. A second group of 36 Americans (mean age 34.3 years at entry) with advanced destructive periodontal disease was monitored for attachment level changes at baseline and 1 year. Of 4101 sites examined at baseline and at 3 years in the Swedish subjects, only 158 sites (3.9%) showed attachment loss of more than 2 mm. No measurable change was found in 1440 sites (35.1 %). Of 4097 sites examined at 3 and 6 years, 67 sites (1.6%) showed attachment loss greater than 2 mm; 57.4% of sites showed no measurable change; and 19 sites (0.5%) showed a decrease in probeable attachment level of more than 2mm. During the 6‐year interval, 523 sites (11.6%) showed attachment loss of more than 2 ram; 20% of sites showed no measurable change and II sites (0.2%) showed more than 2 mm of attachment “gain”. Approximately 50% of sites that showed no measurable change in the first 3‐year period showed loss in the next 3 years. In contrast, of the sites which showed some level of attachment loss in the first period, approximately 2/3 showed no loss in the second monitoring period. Of 3210 sites monitored in the American subjects, 102 sites (3.2%) exhibited more than 2 mm of additional attachment loss; 26% of sites showed no measurable change and 138 sites (4.3%) showed a decrease in probeable attachment level of more than 2 mm. The association between attachment level changes and initial attachment level (baseline) was examined by regression analysis. The slopes of the regression lines for both populations were not consistent with a hypothesis that sites with more advanced attachment loss are more prone to additional destruction, in the absence of treatment, than sites with initially less attachment loss. In the American group, some sites with initially advanced attachment loss, exhibited a decrease in probing attachment level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1983.tb01292.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Lindhe, J., Haffaiee, A. D., & Socransky, S. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-08
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
433-442
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2032664626
Cited by
418
References
0
FWCI
31.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression of periodontal disease in adult subjects in the absence of periodontal therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1983.tb01292.x
The paper
Lindhe, J., Haffaiee, A. D., & Socransky, S. S. (1983). Progression of periodontal disease in adult subjects in the absence of periodontal therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1983.tb01292.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.