Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements

Badersten, Anita, Nilvéaus, Rolf, Egelberg, Jan·1984·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Abstract The reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements in incisors, cuspids and premolars was studied in 2 groups of patients with severely advanced periodontal disease. The results showed that approximately 90% of the recordings could be reproduced within ± 1.0 mm difference. This was found for intra‐exammer as well as inter‐examiner comparisons of 2 examiners. Measurements using onlay margins for reference point demonstrated somewhat less variability than the use of cemento‐enamel junction for reference. The level of reproducibility varied notably between patients and was improved following non‐surgical periodontal therapy. Also, the reproducibility varied significantly between tooth types, tooth surfaces and probing pocket depths. It was concluded that in clinical studies, the evaluation of the healing response of individual lesions should include consideration of the variability of repealed measurements for each of the investigated tooth sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1984.tb01347.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Badersten, A., Nilvéaus, R., & Egelberg, J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-08
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
475-485
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2112503576
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1984.tb01347.x
The paper
Badersten, A., Nilvéaus, R., & Egelberg, J. (1984). Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1984.tb01347.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.