Cited by 15Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationDental Research and COVID-19

Oral cleanliness and gingival health following oral hygiene instruction by selfed-educational programs

Glavind, Leif, Zeuner, Ella, Attsträm, Rolf·1984·Journal Of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the motivational effect of using a periodontal self-examination manual prior to a self-instructional manual in oral hygiene and to examine whether instruction provided at a later time than the scaling procedure improves the effect of the instruction. 74 patients with periodontal disease were divided into 3 groups: (1) A group of 23 patients who performed a self-examination of their periodontal condition prior to self-instruction in oral hygiene; (2) a control group of 27 patients who used only the self-instructional oral hygiene manual; and (3) a group of 24 patients who were not given the self-instructional oral hygiene manual before 6 weeks after the baseline examination. All these patients had their teeth scaled at the start of the study and after 3 and 7 months. The effect of the various modes of instruction was evaluated by assessments of plaque and gingival bleeding scores. These parameters were determined at the baseline and after 2 and 6 weeks and 3 and 7 months. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in plaque and gingival bleeding scores following the use of the self-instructional manual in oral hygiene. The use of the periodontal self-examination manual or a delay of the instruction had no additional effect on oral cleanliness. The level of oral hygiene and gingival health achieved at 3 months was maintained in all 3 groups for an additional period of 4 months. After that time, they were divided into 2 other groups depending on whether or not their plaque score was less than 20%. A total of 26 in the group who had a plaque score higher than 20% demonstrated a plaque score of than 20% after having performed the tooth brushing test. 10 of the remaining patients, who still had a plaque score of more than 20% after the tooth brushing test, received additional instruction in oral hygiene which subsequently resulted in improved oral cleanliness after 6 months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1984.tb02216.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A written self-instructional manual of OHI compared to regular OHI or personalized OHI did not show significant improvement in periodontal outcomes at 6 months.

    “Glavind et al. reported similar findings in two RCTs with a 6-month follow-up when a written self-instructional manual of OHI was compared to regular OHI as a control group [84] as well as a group in which personalized OHI was provided [82].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glavind, L., Zeuner, E., & Attsträm, R.
Corresponding author
Glavind, Leif
Venue
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
262-273
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2029851020
Cited by
15
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal Of Clinical Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tandlægeforeningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
dental hygiene education, self-instructional manual, periodontal disease, plaque control, gingival bleeding, oral hygiene, toothbrushing, scaling, patient motivation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dental Plaque, Dental Prophylaxis, Gingival Diseases, Gingival Hemorrhage, Health Education, Dental, Humans, Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Programmed Instructions as Topic, Teaching, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review