Cited by 20Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationDental Research and COVID-19

Evaluation of a television-tape demonstration for the reinforcement of oral hygiene instruction

Glavind, Leif, Zeuner, Ella·1986·Journal Of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

The effect of using a television-tape demonstration in order to reinforce the advice given in a self-teaching oral hygiene program was evaluated in the present study. The teeth of 24 periodontal patients were scaled and 2 weeks later oral hygiene instruction was given by handling out a self-teaching manual. The patients were divided into 2 groups, matched with regard to the initial status of oral cleanliness. An experimental group (TV) comprising 12 patients who, 1 week after the instruction, were shown a demonstration of proper oral hygiene technique on closed circuit television and a control group of 12 patients who did not receive this reinforcement. The presence or absence of dento-gingival plaque and gingival bleeding by gentle probing was recorded initially and after 8 weeks on 4 surfaces of all teeth. In addition, plaque scores were recorded at 2 and 3 weeks to assess the effect of the oral hygiene self-instruction. At the final examination after 8 weeks, the patients with plaque on more than 20% of the tooth surfaces were subjected to a tooth cleaning test including a subsequent scoring of remaining plaque. The patients in the experimental group (TV) were asked their opinion regarding the television-tape demonstration. Although the patients in the experimental group expressed a positive opinion about viewing the television-tape demonstration, the improvement in the plaque and gingival bleeding scores recorded at the 8-week examination showed no difference between the 2 groups of patients. Similarly, the scoring of plaque after the tooth cleaning test showed no difference between the 2 groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01460.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reinforcing OHI with a 12-minute videotape at 3 weeks after initial OH did not produce additional benefits in periodontal clinical outcomes at 2 months in a sample of 24 patients.

    “However, in a limited sample size of 24 patients, reinforcing OHI with a 12-min videotape at 3 weeks after the initial OH did not produce additional benefits in periodontal clinical outcomes at 2 months [81].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glavind, L., & Zeuner, E.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Glavind, Leif
Venue
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-03
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
201-204
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W1971925969
Cited by
20
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal Of Clinical Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
dental hygiene education, self-education, plaque control, gingival bleeding, periodontal patients, toothbrushing, patient education
MeSH terms
Adult, Audiovisual Aids, Dental Plaque Index, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Gingival Hemorrhage, Health Education, Dental, Humans, Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Teaching, Teaching Materials, Television, Videotape Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review