The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: Transalveolar technique
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of implants placed in sites with transalveolar sinus floor elevation. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on transalveolar sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow‐up time of at least 1 year after functional loading. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random‐effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates/ year proportions. Results: The search provided 849 titles. Full‐text analysis was performed for 176 articles, resulting in 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta‐analysis of these studies indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 2.48% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.37–4.49%) translating to an estimated survival rate of 92.8% (95% CI): 87.4–96.0%) for implants placed in transalveolarly augmented sinuses, after 3 years in function. Furthermore, subject‐based analysis revealed an estimated annual failure of 3.71% (95% CI: 1.21–11.38%), translating to 10.5% (95% CI: 3.6–28.9%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years. Conclusion: Survival rates of implants placed in transalveolar sinus floor augmentation sites are comparable to those in non‐augmented sites. This technique is predictable with a low incidence of complications during and post‐operatively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kirkwood, B. R., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2014) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 2,820
Patient selection and preparation
Lekholm, U. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,173
A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique.
Rb, S. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 976
Pjetursson, B. E., Tan, W. C., Zwahlen, M., & Lang, N. P. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01272.x · Cited by 817
Self-citationSchwartz‐Arad, D., Herzberg, R., & Dolev, E. (2004) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511 · Cited by 430
Kassolis, J. D., Rosen, P. S., & Reynolds, M. A. (2000) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.2000.71.10.1654 · Cited by 330
Ps, R., Summers, R. B., Mellado, et al. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 328
Wood, R. M., & Moore, D. L. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 304
Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla
Zitzmann, N. U., & Schärer, P. (1998) · Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology · doi:10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90391-2 · Cited by 291
Hatano, N., Shimizu, Y., & Ooya, K. (2004) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x · Cited by 270
Cited by
Zitzmann, N. U., Scherrer, S. S., Weiger, R., Lang, N. P., & Walter, C. (2011) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02062.x · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, W. C., Lang, N. P., Zwahlen, M., & Pjetursson, B. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-26
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- s8
- Pages
- 241-254
- ISSN
- 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-051X
- OpenAlex
- W2110307244
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: Transalveolar technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01273.x
- The paper
- Tan, W. C., Lang, N. P., Zwahlen, M., & Pjetursson, B. E. (2008). A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: Transalveolar technique. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01273.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.