Cited by 113Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationDental Education, Practice, Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of an individually tailored oral health educational programme on periodontal health

Open access
Jönsson, Birgitta, Öhrn, Kerstin, Lindberg, Per, Oscarson, Nils·2010·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Jönsson B, Öhrn K, Lindberg P, Oscarson N. Evaluation of an individually tailored oral health educational programme on periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 912–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01590.x Aim: To evaluate an individually tailored oral health educational programme (ITOHEP) on periodontal health compared with a standard oral health educational programme. A further aim was to evaluate whether both interventions had a clinically significant effect on non‐surgical periodontal treatment at 12‐month follow‐up. Material and Method: A randomized, evaluator‐blinded, controlled trial with 113 subjects (60 females and 53 males) randomly allocated into two different active treatments was used. ITOHEP was based on cognitive behavioural principles and motivational interviewing. The control condition was standard oral hygiene education (ST). The effect on bleeding on probing (BoP), periodontal pocket depth, “pocket closure” i.e. percentage of periodontal pocket >4 mm before treatment that were <5 mm after treatment, oral hygiene [plaque indices (PlI)], and participants' global rating of oral health was evaluated. Preset criteria for PlI, BoP, and “pocket closure” were used to describe clinically significant non‐surgical periodontal treatment success. Results: The ITOHEP group had lower BoP scores 12‐month post‐treatment (95% confidence interval: 5–15, p<0.001) than the ST group. No difference between the two groups was observed for “pocket closure” and reduction of periodontal pocket depth. More individuals in the ITOHEP group reached a level of treatment success. Lower PlI scores at baseline and ITOHEP intervention gave higher odds of treatment success. Conclusions: ITOHEP intervention in combination with scaling is preferable to the ST programme in non‐surgical periodontal treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01590.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Htoon H. M., 2007, Assessment criteria for compliance with oral hygiene, Oral Health Preventive Dentistry, 5, 83
  2. Rosling B., 1983, Periodontally treated dentitions, International Dental Journal, 33, 147

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jönsson, B., Öhrn, K., Lindberg, P., & Oscarson, N.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Dalarna University (SE)
  • National Board of Health and Welfare (SE)
Corresponding author
Jönsson, Birgitta
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-07
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
912-919
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2098924913
Cited by
113
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal Of Clinical Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Stiftelsen Patentmedelsfonden för Odontologisk Profylaxforskning
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
non-surgical periodontal therapy, scaling, bleeding on probing, probing depth, plaque index, cognitive-behavioural intervention, motivational interviewing, oral hygiene, treatment success
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Dental Plaque Index, Female, Health Education, Dental, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Index, Periodontal Pocket, Surveys and Questionnaires, Dental Scaling, Health Behavior, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Periodontitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review