Cited by 17Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesDental Health and Care UtilizationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Acceptability of behaviour therapy for dental phobia

Open access
Forbes, M.D.L., Boyle, C.A., Newton, T.·2012·Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Abstract

Forbes MDL, Boyle CA, Newton T. Acceptability of behaviour therapy for dental phobia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40: 1–7. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S Abstract – Objective: To determine how people with dental phobia rate the acceptability of behavioural therapy. Methods: One hundred and twenty individuals with dental phobia participated in a three‐factor experimental vignette‐based design. The three factors examined were dental treatment history, nature of intervention (intravenous sedation or behavioural therapy) and treatment outcome. There were eight different vignettes representing all combinations of the three experimental variables, and 15 participants completed each vignette. Results: Treatment outcome had a strong effect on rated acceptability (F = 115.76, P < 0.001). There was a weaker effect of treatment type (F = 5.49, P < 0.05) with behavioural therapy rated as more acceptable than intravenous sedation. Previous history of intravenous sedation was associated with a decreased perception that it is possible to overcome dental fear. Conclusions: The perceptions of individuals with dental phobia of the acceptability of behavioural approaches to management are influenced by the perceived outcome of the treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00629.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological approaches are known to rehabilitate fearful adults, to be less invasive and preferred by families.

    “Psychological approaches are known to rehabilitate fearful adults, to be less invasive and preferred by families 7-10 .”

    From Cognitive behaviour therapy for anxious paediatric dental patients: a systematic review. (2018) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Additional information section says behavioural treatments can have lasting effects on dental fear, and the Discussion describes psychological treatment as less invasive than sedation. The study assessed adults with dental phobia, not families: its Abstract reports that those adults rated behavioural therapy more acceptable than intravenous sedation. Our copy therefore does not support the claim that psychological approaches are preferred by families. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. King K, Humphris GM. Evidence to confirm the cut- off for screening dental phobia using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale. Soc Sci Dent 2010;1:21-8.
  2. Kazdin AE. Acceptability of alternate treatments for deviant child behaviour. J Appl Behav Anal 1989;2:259-73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forbes, M. D. L., Boyle, C. A., & Newton, T.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Newton, T.
Venue
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-12
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0301-5661 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0528
OpenAlex
W2150210918
Cited by
17
References
22
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dental phobia, dental anxiety, behavior therapy, acceptability, intravenous sedation, treatment outcomes, patient perspectives
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Behavior Therapy, Dental Care, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Dental Anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review