The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of reactivity to a series of commonly fragrances in dermatological patients. A total of 48 fragrances (FF) were chosen, based on the publication of Fenn in 1989 in which the lop 25 constituents of 3 types (1. perfumes, 2. household products, 3. soaps) of 400 commercial products on the US market had been determined. In a pilot study on a total of 1069 patients in 11 centres, the appropriate test concentration and vehicle were examined. For most fragrances, 1% and 5% were chosen, and petrolatum proved to be the best vehicle in comparison to isopropyl myristate and diethyl phthalate. In the main study, a set of 5 to 10 fragrances at 2 concentrations was patch tested in each centre on a minimum of 100 consecutive patients seen in the patch test clinic. These patients were also patch tested to a standard series with the 8% fragrance mix (FM) and its 8 constituents. In patients with a positive reaction to any of the 48 FF, a careful history with regard to past or present reactions to perfumed products was taken. A total of 1323 patients were tested in 11 centres. The 8% FM was positive in 89 patients (8.3% of 1072 patients). Allergic reactions to the constituents were most frequent to oak moss (24), isoeugenol (20), eugenol (13), cinnamic aldehyde (10) and geraniol (8). Reactions read as allergic on day 3/4 were observed only 10 × to 7 materials of the new series (Iso L: Super® (2), Lyral® (3), Cyclacet® (1), DMBCA (1), Vertofix® (1), citronellol (1) and amyl salicylate (1)). The remaining 41 fragrances were negative. 28 irritant or doubtful reactions on day 3/4 were observed to a total of 19 FF materials (more than 1 reaction: 5% citronellol (2), 1%amyl salicylate (2), 1%isononyl acetate (3), 0.1% musk xylol (2). 1%citral (2), and 1% ionone beta (2)). Clinical relevance of positive reactions to any of the FF series was not proved in a single case. This included the 4 reactions in patients who were negative to the 8% FM. In conclusion, the top 25 fragrances commonly found in various products caused few reactions in dermatological patients and these few appeared to be clinically irrelevant, with the possible exeption of Lyral®. However, this data should be interpreted in the light of the relatively small number of patients tested (only 100 in most centres).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adverse reactions to fragrances: A clinical review
de Groot, A. C., & Frosch, P. J. (1997) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00418.x · Cited by 274
Self-citationOxidized Limonene and Oxidized Linalool—Concomitant Contact Allergy to Common Fragrance Terpenes
Bråred Christensson, J., Karlberg, A., Andersen, K. E., Bruze, M., Johansen, J. D., Garcia‐Bravo, B., Giménez Arnau, A., Goh, C., Nixon, R., & White, I. R. (2016) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.12545 · Cited by 66
Self-citationFragrance Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Cheng, J., & Zug, K. A. (2014) · Dermatitis® · doi:10.1097/der.0000000000000067 · Cited by 59
Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetic Products Marketed for Children in Denmark
Botvid, S., Simonsen, A. B., Jørgensen, C., Müller, S., Kirkeby, C. S., Christensen, A. B., & Johansen, J. D. (2023) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.14397 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Frosch, P. J., Pilz, B., Andersen, K. E., Burrows, D., Camarasa, J. G., Dooms‐Goossens, A., Ducombs, G., Fuchs, T., Hannusksela, M., Lachapelle, J. M., Lahti, A., Maibach, H. I., Menné, T., Rycroft, R. J. G., Shaw, S., Wahlberg, J. E., White, I. R., & Wilkinson, J. D.
- Venue
- Contact Dermatitis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 333-342
- ISSN
- 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0536
- OpenAlex
- W1967643352
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02048.x
- The paper
- Frosch, P. J., Pilz, B., Andersen, K. E., Burrows, D., Camarasa, J. G., Dooms‐Goossens, A., Ducombs, G., Fuchs, T., Hannusksela, M., Lachapelle, J. M., Lahti, A., Maibach, H. I., Menné, T., Rycroft, R. J. G., Shaw, S., Wahlberg, J. E., White, I. R., & Wilkinson, J. D. (1995). Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02048.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.