The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adverse reactions to fragrances: A clinical review
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews side‐effects of fragrance materials present in cosmetics with emphasis on clinical aspects: epidemiology, type, of adverse reactions, clinical picture, diagnostic procedures, and the sensitizers. Considering the ubiquitous occurrence of fragrance materials, the risk of side‐effects is small. In absolute numbers, however, fragrance allergy is common, affecting approximately 1% of the general population. Although a detailed profile of patients sensitized to fragrances needs to be elucidated, common features of contact allergy are: axillary dermatitis, dermatitis of the face (including the eyelids) and neck, well‐circumscribed patches in areas of “dubbing‐on” perfumes (wrists, behind the ears) and (aggravation of) hand eczema. Depending on the degree of sensitivity, the severity of dermatitis may range from mild to severe with dissemination and even erythroderma. Airborne or “connubial” contact dermatitis should always be suspected. Other less frequent adverse reactions to fragrances are photocontact dermatitis, immediate contact reactions and pigmentary changes. The fragrance mix, although very useful for the detection of sensitive patients, both causes False‐positive and false‐negative reactions, and detects only 70% of perfume‐allergic patients. Therefore, future research should be directed at increasing the sensitivity and the specificity of the mix. Relevance is said to be established in 50–65% of positive reactions, but accurate criteria are needed. Suggestions are made for large‐scale investigation of several fragrances on the basis of literature data and frequency of use in cosmetics. The literature on adverse reactions to balsam of Peru (an indicator for fragrance sensitivity), essential oils (which currently appear to be used more in aromatherapy than in perfumery) and on fragrances used as flavours and spices in foods and beverages is not discussed in detail, but pertinent side‐effects data are tabulated and relevant literature is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textbook of Contact Dermatitis
(1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03104-9 · Cited by 492
A five-year study of cosmetic reactions
Adams, R. M., Maibach, H. I., Adams, R. M., Maibach, H. I., Clendenning, W. E., Fisher, A. A., Jordan, W. J., Kanof, N., Larsen, W., Mitchell, J. C., et al. (1985) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70258-7 · Cited by 359
Nielsen, N. H., & Menné, T. (1992) · Acta Dermato-Venereologica · doi:10.2340/0001555572456460 · Cited by 310
The repeated open application test (ROAT)
Hannuksela, M., & Salo, H. (1986) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1986.tb01229.x · Cited by 281
Air oxidation of d‐limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens
Karlberg, A., Magnusson, K., & Nilsson, U. (1992) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00129.x · Cited by 243
Unwanted Effects of Cosmetics and Drugs Used in Dermatology
Draelos, Z. (1995) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1995.01690160129031 · Cited by 242
Perfumes: art, science and technology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3316 · Cited by 215
Frosch, P. J., Pilz, B., Andersen, K. E., Burrows, D., Camarasa, J. G., Dooms‐Goossens, A., Ducombs, G., Fuchs, T., Hannusksela, M., Lachapelle, J. M., et al. (1995) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02048.x · Cited by 209
Self-citationPerfume dermatitis. a study of 20 patients
Larsen, W. G. (1977) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.113.5.623 · Cited by 159
de Groot, A. C. (1988) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.124.10.1525 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Fragranced consumer products and undisclosed ingredients
Steinemann, A. C. (2009) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.002 · Cited by 139
Heisterberg, M. V., Menné, T., & Johansen, J. D. (2011) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01962.x · Cited by 123
Fragrance Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Cheng, J., & Zug, K. A. (2014) · Dermatitis® · doi:10.1097/der.0000000000000067 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- de Groot, A. C., & Frosch, P. J.
- Venue
- Contact Dermatitis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-86
- ISSN
- 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0536
- OpenAlex
- W1518977425
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverse reactions to fragrances: A clinical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00418.x
- The paper
- de Groot, A. C., & Frosch, P. J. (1997). Adverse reactions to fragrances: A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00418.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.