Difficulties in avoiding exposure to allergens in cosmetics
Abstract
The aim of the study is to describe the ability of patients with allergic contact dermatitis to avoid exposure to allergens in cosmetics. The study is a questionnaire survey among 382 patients with contact allergy to preservatives and fragrances, included from 3 dermatological clinics. The questionnaire included questions about the level of difficulty in reading labels of ingredients on cosmetics and about patients’ strategies to avoid substances they were allergic to. It also included questions about eczema severity as well as about educational level. 46% of the patients found it difficult or extremely difficult to read the ingredient labelling of cosmetics, and this finding was significantly related to low educational level. Patients allergic to formaldehyde and methyldibromo glutaronitrile experienced the worst difficulties, while patients with fragrance allergy found ingredient label reading easier than patients with preservative allergy. Reading of ingredient labels is a major problem for patients with contact allergy to allergens in consumer products. It is a general problem for all patients and not restricted to a small group with multiple allergies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In that Danish series, more patients with allergies to preservatives than to fragrance experienced major difficulties with ingredient label reading, probably because of the necessity of also being aware of formaldehyde releasers.
“more patients with allergies to preservatives than to fragrance experienced major difficulties with ingredient label reading, probably because of the necessity of also being aware of formaldehyde releasers5”
From Knowledge and Behavior Regarding Cosmetics in Koreans Visiting Dermatology Clinics (2017) · cites this paper as [5]
In a Danish series, 46% of patients with contact allergy to preservatives and fragrances had difficulty reading the ingredient labelling of cosmetics, and this was significantly correlated to low educational level.
“46% of Danish patients with contact allergy to preservatives and fragrances had difficulty reading the ingredient labelling of cosmetics, and this was significantly correlated to low educational level5”
From Knowledge and Behavior Regarding Cosmetics in Koreans Visiting Dermatology Clinics (2017) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lundov, M. D., Moesby, L., Zachariae, C., & Johansen, J. D. (2009) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01501.x · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationBennike, N. H., Oturai, N. B., Müller, S., Kirkeby, C. S., Jørgensen, C., Christensen, A. B., Zachariae, C., & Johansen, J. D. (2018) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.14513 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationFragrance Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Cheng, J., & Zug, K. A. (2014) · Dermatitis® · doi:10.1097/der.0000000000000067 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Knowledge and Behavior Regarding Cosmetics in Koreans Visiting Dermatology Clinics
Cho, S., Oh, S., Kim, N. I., Ro, Y. S., Kim, J. S., Park, Y. M., Park, C. W., Lee, W. J., Kim, D. K., Lee, D. W., et al. (2017) · Annals of Dermatology · doi:10.5021/ad.2017.29.2.180 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Noiesen, E., Munk, M. D., Larsen, K., Johansen, J. D., & Agner, T.
- Affiliations
- Gentofte Hospital (DK)
- Danish National Centre for Social Research (DK)
- Roskilde Sygehus (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Noiesen, Eline
- Venue
- Contact Dermatitis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-109
- ISSN
- 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0536
- OpenAlex
- W1997221222
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contact Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Kongelig Hofbuntmager Aage Bangs Fond
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
- Keywords
- allergic contact dermatitis, cosmetics, allergen avoidance, fragrance allergy, preservative allergy, formaldehyde, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, eczema severity, educational attainment, patient strategies
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Allergens, Cosmetics, Denmark, Drug Labeling, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review