Cited by 50Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDermatology and Skin DiseasesDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Difficulties in avoiding exposure to allergens in cosmetics

Noiesen, Eline, Munk, Martin D., Larsen, Kristian, Johansen, Jeanne Duus, Agner, Tove·2007·Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

The aim of the study is to describe the ability of patients with allergic contact dermatitis to avoid exposure to allergens in cosmetics. The study is a questionnaire survey among 382 patients with contact allergy to preservatives and fragrances, included from 3 dermatological clinics. The questionnaire included questions about the level of difficulty in reading labels of ingredients on cosmetics and about patients’ strategies to avoid substances they were allergic to. It also included questions about eczema severity as well as about educational level. 46% of the patients found it difficult or extremely difficult to read the ingredient labelling of cosmetics, and this finding was significantly related to low educational level. Patients allergic to formaldehyde and methyldibromo glutaronitrile experienced the worst difficulties, while patients with fragrance allergy found ingredient label reading easier than patients with preservative allergy. Reading of ingredient labels is a major problem for patients with contact allergy to allergens in consumer products. It is a general problem for all patients and not restricted to a small group with multiple allergies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01170.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that Danish series, more patients with allergies to preservatives than to fragrance experienced major difficulties with ingredient label reading, probably because of the necessity of also being aware of formaldehyde releasers.

    “more patients with allergies to preservatives than to fragrance experienced major difficulties with ingredient label reading, probably because of the necessity of also being aware of formaldehyde releasers5”
  • In a Danish series, 46% of patients with contact allergy to preservatives and fragrances had difficulty reading the ingredient labelling of cosmetics, and this was significantly correlated to low educational level.

    “46% of Danish patients with contact allergy to preservatives and fragrances had difficulty reading the ingredient labelling of cosmetics, and this was significantly correlated to low educational level5”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noiesen, E., Munk, M. D., Larsen, K., Johansen, J. D., & Agner, T.
Affiliations
  • Gentofte Hospital (DK)
  • Danish National Centre for Social Research (DK)
  • Roskilde Sygehus (DK)
Corresponding author
Noiesen, Eline
Venue
Contact Dermatitis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-11
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
105-109
ISSN
  • 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0536
OpenAlex
W1997221222
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contact Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kongelig Hofbuntmager Aage Bangs Fond
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
allergic contact dermatitis, cosmetics, allergen avoidance, fragrance allergy, preservative allergy, formaldehyde, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, eczema severity, educational attainment, patient strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Allergens, Cosmetics, Denmark, Drug Labeling, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review