The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population – prevalence and main findings
Open accessAbstract
A substantial number of studies have investigated the prevalence of contact allergy in the general population and in unselected subgroups of the general population. The aim of this review was to determine a median prevalence and summarize the main findings from studies on contact allergy in the general population. Published research mainly originates from North America and Western Europe. The median prevalence of contact allergy to at least 1 allergen was 21.2% (range 12.5–40.6%), and the weighted average prevalence was 19.5%, based on data collected on all age groups and all countries between 1966 and 2007. The most prevalent contact allergens were nickel, thimerosal, and fragrance mix. The median nickel allergy prevalence was 8.6% (range 0.7–27.8%) and demonstrates that nickel was an important cause of contact allergy in the general population and that it was widespread in both men and women. Numerous studies demonstrated that pierced ears were a significant risk factor for nickel allergy. Nickel was a risk factor for hand eczema in women. Finally, heavy smoking was associated with contact allergy, mostly in women. Population‐based epidemiological studies are considered a prerequisite in the surveillance of national and international contact allergy epidemics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods
Urbisch, D., Mehling, A., Guth, K., Ramirez, T., Honarvar, N., Kolle, S., Landsiedel, R., Jaworska, J., Kern, P. S., Gerberick, F., et al. (2015) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.008 · Cited by 398
Trace Elements in Human Nutrition (II)—An Update
Mehri, A. (2020) · International Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_48_19 · Cited by 395
Dhingra, N., Shemer, A., Correa da Rosa, J., Rozenblit, M., Fuentes-Duculan, J., Gittler, J. K., Finney, R., Czarnowicki, T., Zheng, X., Xu, H., et al. (2014) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.009 · Cited by 305
Influences of environmental chemicals on atopic dermatitis.
Kim, K. (2015) · Toxicological Research · doi:10.5487/tr.2015.31.2.089 · Cited by 85
Leontaridou, M. (2017) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1606271 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Thyssen, J. P., Linneberg, A., Menné, T., & Johansen, J. D.
- Venue
- Contact Dermatitis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 287-299
- ISSN
- 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0536
- OpenAlex
- W2087421650
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population – prevalence and main findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x
- The paper
- Thyssen, J. P., Linneberg, A., Menné, T., & Johansen, J. D. (2007). The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population – prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.