The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
U‐CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data
Abstract
In any statistical analysis, assessing the goodness of fit of a model to the data is crucial to avoid drawing incorrect conclusions. U‐CARE is a computer application that deals with the mandatory first steps of the analyses of capture–recapture data: the preparation of the data set and the assessment of the fit of a general model (Cormack‐Jolly‐Seber and variants for single‐state data; Jolly‐Move and variants for multi‐state data). U‐CARE implements the current state of the art in goodness‐of‐fit testing by incorporating components aimed at detecting the most likely departures from assumptions (). It is a free and stand‐alone application for Windows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals
White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999) · Bird Study · doi:10.1080/00063659909477239 · Cited by 7,499
Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., & Anderson, D. R. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937171 · Cited by 4,517
Self-citationModel Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
Beier, P., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2001) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3803117 · Cited by 2,440
Koziol, J. A., D'Agostino, R. B., & Stephens, M. A. (1987) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165059 · Cited by 1,982
King, T. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1987.10488292 · Cited by 1,859
Capture-Recapture Studies for Multiple Strata Including Non-Markovian Transitions
Brownie, C., Hines, J. E., Nichols, J. D., Pollock, K. H., & Hestbeck, J. B. (1993) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532259 · Cited by 751
SINGLETON, G. R., BROWN, P. R., PECH, R. P., JACOB, J., MUTZE, G. J., & KREBS, C. J. (2005) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00458.x · Cited by 611
Estimates of Movement and Site Fidelity Using Mark‐Resight Data of Wintering Canada Geese
Hestbeck, J. B., Nichols, J. D., & Malecki, R. A. (1991) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2937193 · Cited by 515
Program E-Surge: A Software Application for Fitting Multievent Models
Choquet, R., Rouan, L., & Pradel, R. (2009) · Modeling Demographic Processes In Marked Populations · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78151-8_39 · Cited by 456
Self-citation
Cited by
A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologists
Conn, P. B., Johnson, D. S., Williams, P. J., Melin, S. R., & Hooten, M. B. (2018) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1314 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Choquet, R., Lebreton, J., Gimenez, O., Reboulet, A., & Pradel, R.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1071-1074
- ISSN
- 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0587
- OpenAlex
- W1983347342
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 31.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: U‐CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05968.x
- The paper
- Choquet, R., Lebreton, J., Gimenez, O., Reboulet, A., & Pradel, R. (2009). U‐CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05968.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
