The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scale dependency of processes structuring metacommunities of cladocerans in temporary pools of High‐Andes wetlands
Open accessAbstract
Metacommunity structure can be shaped by a variety of processes operating at different spatial scales. With increasing scale, the compositional variation among local communities (beta diversity) may reflect stronger environmental heterogeneity, but may also reflect reduced exchange of organisms between habitat patches. We analyzed the spatial architecture of a metacommunity of cladoceran zooplankton in temporary pools of High Andes wetlands, with the objective of explaining the spatial dependency of its structure. The spatial distribution of the pools is hierarchical and highly discontinuous: pools are clustered within small wetlands, which lay scattered over valleys that are separated from each other by mountain ridges. We studied a total of 59 pools, belonging to six different wetlands in four different valleys. We assessed pool environmental heterogeneity and sampled active communities and dormant propagule banks of cladoceran zooplankton. Environmental heterogeneity proved very high within wetlands and showed almost no increase with increasing spatial scale. Conversely, diversity partitioning analyses indicated an increase in beta diversity with spatial scale, especially among valleys. Variation partitioning on environmental data and spatial RDA models suggested environmental heterogeneity as the most important generator of beta diversity within wetlands. At the largest spatial scale, beta diversity manifested itself mainly as a differentiation of species occurrence patterns among valleys, which could not be entirely explained by environmental variables. Our study thus presents a case where environmental control seems to be the dominant metacommunity structuring process at the smallest spatial scale, whereas neutral processes and dispersal limitation are the most likely generators of beta diversity at the largest spatial scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data
Legendre, P., & Gallagher, E. D. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420100716 · Cited by 5,556
Self-citation
Cited by
Orsini, L., Vanoverbeke, J., Swillen, I., Mergeay, J., & De Meester, L. (2013) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12561 · Cited by 494
The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: Patterns, processes, and pathways
Tonkin, J. D., Altermatt, F., Finn, D. S., Heino, J., Olden, J. D., Pauls, S. U., & Lytle, D. A. (2018) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.13037 · Cited by 451
Hill, M. J., Heino, J., Thornhill, I., Ryves, D. B., & Wood, P. J. (2017) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.04266 · Cited by 138
Frau, D., Moran, B. J., Arengo, F., Marconi, P., Battauz, Y., Mora, C., Manzo, R., Mayora, G., & Boutt, D. F. (2021) · Hydrology · doi:10.3390/hydrology8040164 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Declerck, S. A. J., Coronel, J. S., Legendre, P., & Brendonck, L.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-24
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296-305
- ISSN
- 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0587
- OpenAlex
- W2115528591
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scale dependency of processes structuring metacommunities of cladocerans in temporary pools of High‐Andes wetlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06462.x
- The paper
- Declerck, S. A. J., Coronel, J. S., Legendre, P., & Brendonck, L. (2011). Scale dependency of processes structuring metacommunities of cladocerans in temporary pools of High‐Andes wetlands. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06462.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.