The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilineage differentiation potential of human dermal skin‐derived fibroblasts
Abstract
Abstract: Dermal skin‐derived fibroblasts from rodent and human have been found to exhibit mesenchymal surface antigen immunophenotype and differentiation potential along the three main mesenchymal‐derived tissues: bone, cartilage and fat. Human dermal skin‐derived mesenchymal stem cells constitute a promising cell source in clinical applications. Therefore, we isolated fibroblastic mesenchymal stem‐cell‐like cells from human dermis derived from juvenile foreskins, which share a mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multi‐lineage differentiation potential. We could show similar expression patterns for CD14(−), CD29(+), CD31(−), CD34(−), CD44(+), CD45(−), CD71(+), CD73/SH3‐SH4(+), CD90/Thy‐1(+), CD105/SH2(+), CD133(−) and CD166/ALCAM(+) in well‐established adipose tissue derived‐stem cells and fibroblastic mesenchymal stem‐cell‐like cells by flow cytometry. Immunostainings showed that fibroblastic mesenchymal stem‐cell‐like cells expressed vimentin, fibronectin and collagen; they were less positive for α‐smooth muscle actin and nestin, while they were negative for epithelial cytokeratins. When cultured under appropriate inducible conditions, both cell types could differentiate along the adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. Additionally, fibroblastic mesenchymal stem‐cell‐like cells demonstrated a high proliferation potential. These findings are of particular importance, because skin or adipose tissues are easily accessible for autologous cell transplantations in regenerative medicine. In summary, these data indicate that dermal fibroblasts with multilineage differentiation potential are present in human dermis and they might play a key role in cutaneous wound healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Singer, A. J., & Clark, R. A. F. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909023411006 · Cited by 6,106
Cited by
The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer
Kalluri, R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.73 · Cited by 4,366
Concise Review: The Surface Markers and Identity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Lv, F.-J., Tuan, R. S., Cheung, K. M. C., & Leung, V. Y. L. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1681 · Cited by 984
A peek into cancer-associated fibroblasts: origins, functions and translational impact
LeBleu, V. S., & Kalluri, R. (2018) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.029447 · Cited by 537
LI, X., BAI, J., JI, X., LI, R., XUAN, Y., & WANG, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3892/ijmm.2014.1821 · Cited by 301
Exploring the role of stem cells in cutaneous wound healing
Lau, K., Paus, R., Tiede, S., Day, P., & Bayat, A. (2009) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00942.x · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenz, K., Sicker, M., Schmelzer, E., Rupf, T., Salvetter, J., Schulz‐Siegmund, M., & Bader, A.
- Venue
- Experimental Dermatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 925-932
- ISSN
- 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0625
- OpenAlex
- W2013868151
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilineage differentiation potential of human dermal skin‐derived fibroblasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00724.x
- The paper
- Lorenz, K., Sicker, M., Schmelzer, E., Rupf, T., Salvetter, J., Schulz‐Siegmund, M., & Bader, A. (2008). Multilineage differentiation potential of human dermal skin‐derived fibroblasts. Experimental Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00724.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.