Cited by 109Fish Ecology and Management StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesMarine Ecology and Invasive Species

Foraging behaviour and invasiveness: do invasive Gambusia exhibit higher feeding rates and broader diets than their noninvasive relatives?

Rehage, J. S., Barnett, B. K., Sih, A.·2005·Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Abstract

– Serious impacts by nonindigenous species often occur via predation. The magnitude of impact is expected to be closely tied to the invading species niche breadth. For predatory impacts, diet breadth should be particularly important. We examined the relationship between a species foraging behaviour and its invasiveness and impact by comparing the feeding behaviour of four Gambusia species, two invasive and of high impact and two noninvasive. Individual feeding rates, feeding preferences, and diet breadths were tested across three prey items in a sequence of four laboratory feeding trials. Invasive Gambusia consistently fed at higher rates, but no species differences were found in feeding preferences or diet breadth. All Gambusia preferred Daphnia, avoided Lirceus, and consumed Drosophila in proportion to their availability. Female size affected most feeding variables. Larger fish consumed more prey per unit time and were able to incorporate larger prey items into their diets, thus increasing diet breadth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00109.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such predation strategies likely aid invasive species during establishment in novel environments where the food base may differ from the species' natural range, providing an abundance of diverse potential prey resources that would only rarely be limiting.

    “Such predation strategies likely aid invasive species during establishment in novel environments where the food base may differ from the species' natural range (Grabowska & Grabowski 2005, Pine et al. 2005), providing an abundance of diverse potential prey resources that would only rarely be limiting (Grabowska & Grabowski 2005, Rehage et al. 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rehage, J. S., Barnett, B. K., & Sih, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Ecology of Freshwater Fish
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-28
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
352-360
ISSN
  • 0906-6691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0633
OpenAlex
W2080774354
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecology Of Freshwater Fish (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Environmental Biology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
Keywords
Gambusia, invasive species, foraging behavior, feeding rate, diet breadth, feeding preference, predation, introduced species, Daphnia, Drosophila, female body size, prey size, freshwater fish

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review