The DOI matches its Crossref record.
European Indoor Air Quality Audit Project in 56 Office Buildings
Abstract
Abstract A European project started at the end of 1992, in which, in addition to current methods, trained sensory panels were used to investigate office buildings all over Europe. The main aim of this EC-Audit was to develop assessment procedures and guidance on ventilation and source control, to help optimize energy use in buildings while assuring good indoor air quality. In each of nine countries, six or more office buildings were selected. Measurements were performed at five selected locations in each building. The buildings were studied while normally occupied and ventilated to identify the pollution sources in the spaces and to quantify the total pollution load caused by the occupants and their activities, as well as the ventilation systems. The investigation included physical and chemical measurements, assessment of the perceived air quality in the spaces by a trained sensory panel, and measurement of the outdoor air supply to the spaces. A questionnaire for evaluating retrospective and immediate symptoms and perceptions was given to the occupants of the buildings. The building characteristics were described by use of a check-list. The annual energy consumption of the buildings and the weather conditions were registered. This paper presents results and conclusions of the audit in 56 buildings in Europe. However, the analysis and discussions of the results are a summary of the work done, and are focused mainly on comparison between sensory assessments and the other measurements performed. Furthermore, this paper brings the results of the study based on a two-factor analysis. A paper dealing with results on a multifactorial analysis is in preparation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seppanen, O. A., Fisk, W. J., & Mendell, M. J. (1999) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.00003.x · Cited by 876
WARGOCKI, P., WYON, D. P., SUNDELL, J., CLAUSEN, G., & FANGER, P. O. (2000) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004222.x · Cited by 688
Self-citationWargocki, P., Wyon, D. P., Baik, Y. K., Clausen, G., & Fanger, P. O. (1999) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-1-00003.x · Cited by 507
Self-citationWolkoff, P., Wilkins, C. K., Clausen, P. A., & Nielsen, G. D. (2006) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00393.x · Cited by 348
Indoor air pollutants in office environments: Assessment of comfort, health, and performance
Wolkoff, P. (2013) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.001 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Bluyssen, P. M., Oliveira Fernandes, E., Groes, L., Clausen, G., Fanger, P. O., Valbjorn, O., Bernhard, C. A., & Roulet, C. A.
- Venue
- Indoor Air
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-238
- ISSN
- 0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0668
- OpenAlex
- W2127082595
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Indoor Air Quality Audit Project in 56 Office Buildings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1996.00002.x
- The paper
- Bluyssen, P. M., Oliveira Fernandes, E., Groes, L., Clausen, G., Fanger, P. O., Valbjorn, O., Bernhard, C. A., & Roulet, C. A. (1996). European Indoor Air Quality Audit Project in 56 Office Buildings. Indoor Air. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1996.00002.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.