The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analyses of the associations of respiratory health effects with dampness and mold in homes
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences recently completed a critical review of the scientific literature pertaining to the association of indoor dampness and mold contamination with adverse health effects. In this paper, we report the results of quantitative meta-analyses of the studies reviewed in the IOM report plus other related studies. We developed point estimates and confidence intervals (CIs) of odds ratios (ORs) that summarize the association of several respiratory and asthma-related health outcomes with the presence of dampness and mold in homes. The ORs and CIs from the original studies were transformed to the log scale and random effect models were applied to the log ORs and their variance. Models accounted for the correlation between multiple results within the studies analyzed. Central estimates of ORs for the health outcomes ranged from 1.34 to 1.75. CIs (95%) excluded unity in nine of 10 instances, and in most cases the lower bound of the CI exceeded 1.2. Based on the results of the meta-analyses, building dampness and mold are associated with approximately 30-50% increases in a variety of respiratory and asthma-related health outcomes. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of these meta-analyses reinforce the IOM's recommendation that actions be taken to prevent and reduce building dampness problems, and also allow estimation of the magnitude of adverse public health impacts associated with failure to do so.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Bornehag, C. G., Sundell, J., Hagerhed-Engman, L., Sigsggard, T., Janson, S., Aberg, N., & DBH Study Group (2005) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00306.x · Cited by 250
Quantification of airborne moulds in the homes of children with and without wheeze.
Strachan, D. P., Flannigan, B., McCabe, E. M., & McGarry, F. (1990) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.45.5.382 · Cited by 173
Cited by
Nazaroff, W. W. (2016) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/ina.12174 · Cited by 304
Allergy and asthma: effects of the exposure to particulate matter and biological allergens
Baldacci, S., Maio, S., Cerrai, S., Sarno, G., Baïz, N., Simoni, M., Annesi-Maesano, I., & Viegi, G. (2015) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2015.05.017 · Cited by 282
Risk and Protective Factors for Childhood Asthma: What Is the Evidence?
Castro-Rodriguez, J. A., Forno, E., Rodriguez-Martinez, C. E., & Celedón, J. C. (2016) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2016.05.003 · Cited by 258
Deng, Q., Lu, C., Ou, C., Chen, L., & Yuan, H. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.032 · Cited by 136
The influence of urban exposures and residence on childhood asthma
Grant, T. L., & Wood, R. A. (2022) · Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · doi:10.1111/pai.13784 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisk, W. J., Lei-Gomez, Q., & Mendell, M. J.
- Venue
- Indoor Air
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 284-296
- ISSN
- 0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0668
- OpenAlex
- W2049640025
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analyses of the associations of respiratory health effects with dampness and mold in homes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00475.x
- The paper
- Fisk, W. J., Lei-Gomez, Q., & Mendell, M. J. (2007). Meta-analyses of the associations of respiratory health effects with dampness and mold in homes. Indoor Air. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00475.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.